head to head · open source
deck.gl vs flint-chart
deck.gl has 14,732 GitHub stars, 2,297 forks, 532 open issues and last shipped yesterday. flint-chart has 4,537 stars, 268 forks, 32 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. deck.gl leads on adoption by 225% (14,732 vs 4,537 stars). deck.gl is written in TypeScript under MIT; flint-chart is written in TypeScript under MIT. deck.gl has attracted 16% as many forks as stars, flint-chart 6%. deck.gl was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (data-visualization), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| deck.gl | flint-chart | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 15K | ★ 4.5K |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | TypeScript | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-11-04 | 2026-11-03 |
| Forks | ⑂ 2.3K | ⑂ 268 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick deck.gl if
- You weight community size — 15K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick flint-chart if
- You want the flint-chart feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and flint-chart fits your workflow better
About deck.gl
deck.gl Website GPU powered, highly performant large scale data visualization deck.gl is designed to simplify high performance, WebGL2/WebGPU based visualization of large data sets. Users can quickly get impressive visual results with minimal effort by composing existing layers, or leverage deck.gl's extensible architecture to address custom needs. deck.gl maps data (usually an array of JSON objects) into a stack of visual layers e.g. icons, polygons, texts; and look at them with views : e.g. map, first person, orthographic. deck.gl handles a number of challenges out of the box: Performant rendering and updating…
read the full deck.gl overview →
About flint-chart
Flint: A Visualization Language for the AI Era Please visit: Flint Project Site Visual Themes MCP Server Guide 中文主页 Flint is a visualization intermediate language that lets AI agents turn simple, human editable chart specs into expressive, polished visualizations . Rather than requiring agents to hardcode verbose parameters for scales, axes, spacing, labels, and layout, Flint derives those decisions from a high level semantic specification, the data, and an optional visual theme (e.g., New York Times, Economist, Swiss, and McKinsey). A compact spec compiles to native Vega Lite, ECharts, Chart.js, Plotly specs…
read the full flint-chart overview →
More in Data & Analytics
Related comparisons
More Business Intelligence & Reporting projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Business Intelligence & Reporting field.
Frequently asked questions
Is deck.gl or flint-chart more popular?
deck.gl has 14,732 GitHub stars and flint-chart has 4,537. deck.gl has the larger community by that measure.
Are deck.gl and flint-chart free?
Both are open source. deck.gl is licensed under MIT and flint-chart under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between deck.gl and flint-chart?
deck.gl is written in TypeScript and flint-chart in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, deck.gl or flint-chart?
Choose deck.gl if you want the larger community (14,732 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose flint-chart if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.