head to head · open source

debezium vs conduit

debezium has 13,129 GitHub stars, 3,042 forks, 131 open issues and last shipped yesterday. conduit has 611 stars, 63 forks, 123 open issues and last shipped yesterday. debezium leads on adoption by 2,049% (13,129 vs 611 stars). debezium is written in Java under Apache-2.0; conduit is written in Go under Apache-2.0. debezium has attracted 23% as many forks as stars, conduit 10%. debezium was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (data-pipeline, kafka), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

debezium ★ 13K conduit ★ 611 category Data & Analytics

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

debezium conduit
GitHub stars ★ 13K ★ 611
License Apache-2.0 Apache-2.0
Written in Java Go
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 3.0K ⑂ 63
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick debezium if

  • You weight community size — 13K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Java
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full debezium profile →

pick conduit if

  • You want the conduit feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and conduit fits your workflow better

full conduit profile →

About debezium

Debezium is an open source, low latency change data capture (CDC) platform that monitors databases and turns every row level change into an ordered event stream that applications consume, and it is built for Java teams already running Apache Kafka and Kafka Connect.

read the full debezium overview →

About conduit

Conduit is an Apache 2.0 licenced data streaming tool written in Go that moves records between production data stores in real time, and it is aimed at data engineers who want Kafka Connect style pipelines without a JVM in the stack.

read the full conduit overview →

More in Data & Analytics

Mermaid ★ 90K Crawl4AI ★ 84K Scrapling ★ 82K Apache Superset ★ 75K echarts ★ 67K scrapy ★ 64K

Related comparisons

airbyte vs debezium cube vs debezium shardingsphere vs debezium airbyte vs cube airbyte vs shardingsphere cube vs shardingsphere airbyte vs cocoindex cube vs cocoindex crawl4ai vs scrapling crawl4ai vs scrapy scrapling vs scrapy crawl4ai vs easyspider scrapling vs easyspider crawl4ai vs changedetection-io scrapling vs changedetection-io crawl4ai vs lux mermaid vs apache-superset mermaid vs echarts apache-superset vs echarts mermaid vs metabase mermaid vs pixijs mermaid vs diagram-design apache-superset vs metabase apache-superset vs pixijs

More Data Engineering & Integration projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Engineering & Integration field.

debezium vs Airbyte debezium vs Cube debezium vs shardingsphere debezium vs CocoIndex debezium vs seatunnel debezium vs steampipe debezium vs realtime debezium vs CloudQuery debezium vs flink-cdc debezium vs Lightdash debezium vs fluvio debezium vs whodb

Frequently asked questions

Is debezium or conduit more popular?

debezium has 13,129 GitHub stars and conduit has 611. debezium has the larger community by that measure.

Are debezium and conduit free?

Both are open source. debezium is licensed under Apache-2.0 and conduit under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between debezium and conduit?

debezium is written in Java and conduit in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, debezium or conduit?

Choose debezium if you want the larger community (13,129 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose conduit if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.