head to head · open source

debezium vs chunjun

debezium has 13,129 GitHub stars, 3,042 forks, 131 open issues and last shipped yesterday. chunjun has 4,101 stars, 1,683 forks, 287 open issues and last shipped 10 months ago. debezium leads on adoption by 220% (13,129 vs 4,101 stars). debezium is written in Java under Apache-2.0; chunjun is written in Java under Apache-2.0. debezium has attracted 23% as many forks as stars, chunjun 41%. debezium was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

debezium ★ 13K chunjun ★ 4.1K category Data & Analytics

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

debezium chunjun
GitHub stars ★ 13K ★ 4.1K
License Apache-2.0 Apache-2.0
Written in Java Java
Last push 2026-09-17 2025-12-02
Forks ⑂ 3.0K ⑂ 1.7K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick debezium if

  • You weight community size — 13K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Java
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full debezium profile →

pick chunjun if

  • You want the chunjun feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Java
  • You evaluated both and chunjun fits your workflow better

full chunjun profile →

About debezium

Debezium is an open source, low latency change data capture (CDC) platform that monitors databases and turns every row level change into an ordered event stream that applications consume, and it is built for Java teams already running Apache Kafka and Kafka Connect.

read the full debezium overview →

About chunjun

ChunJun is a Java based, Apache 2.0 licensed data integration framework that lives in the Apache Flink big data ecosystem. It is a distributed framework for synchronization and calculation between heterogeneous data sources, and it was initially known as FlinkX before being renamed ChunJun on February 22, 2022.

read the full chunjun overview →

More in Data & Analytics

Mermaid ★ 90K Crawl4AI ★ 84K Scrapling ★ 82K Apache Superset ★ 75K echarts ★ 67K scrapy ★ 64K

Related comparisons

airbyte vs debezium cube vs debezium shardingsphere vs debezium airbyte vs cube airbyte vs shardingsphere cube vs shardingsphere airbyte vs cocoindex cube vs cocoindex crawl4ai vs scrapling crawl4ai vs scrapy scrapling vs scrapy crawl4ai vs easyspider scrapling vs easyspider crawl4ai vs changedetection-io scrapling vs changedetection-io crawl4ai vs lux mermaid vs apache-superset mermaid vs echarts apache-superset vs echarts mermaid vs metabase mermaid vs pixijs mermaid vs diagram-design apache-superset vs metabase apache-superset vs pixijs

More Data Engineering & Integration projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Engineering & Integration field.

debezium vs Airbyte debezium vs Cube debezium vs shardingsphere debezium vs CocoIndex debezium vs seatunnel debezium vs steampipe debezium vs realtime debezium vs CloudQuery debezium vs flink-cdc debezium vs Lightdash debezium vs fluvio debezium vs whodb

Frequently asked questions

Is debezium or chunjun more popular?

debezium has 13,129 GitHub stars and chunjun has 4,101. debezium has the larger community by that measure.

Are debezium and chunjun free?

Both are open source. debezium is licensed under Apache-2.0 and chunjun under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between debezium and chunjun?

debezium is written in Java and chunjun in Java. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, debezium or chunjun?

Choose debezium if you want the larger community (13,129 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose chunjun if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.