head to head · open source
Cube vs seatunnel-web
Cube has 21,147 GitHub stars, 2,179 forks, 1,185 open issues and last shipped yesterday. seatunnel-web has 888 stars, 371 forks, 27 open issues and last shipped 10 months ago. Cube leads on adoption by 2,281% (21,147 vs 888 stars). Cube is written in Rust under a custom or non-standard licence; seatunnel-web is written in Java under Apache-2.0. Cube has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, seatunnel-web 42%. Cube was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Cube | seatunnel-web | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 21K | ★ 888 |
| License | Custom / other | Apache-2.0 |
| Written in | Rust | Java |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-01-22 |
| Forks | ⑂ 2.2K | ⑂ 371 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Cube if
- You weight community size — 21K stars and counting
- You want the Custom / other license terms
- Your stack matches Rust
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick seatunnel-web if
- You want the seatunnel-web feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Java
- You evaluated both and seatunnel-web fits your workflow better
About Cube
Website • Docs • Examples • Blog • Slack • X Cube Core is the open source semantic layer. Define metrics, dimensions, joins, and access rules once in code, then expose them through SQL, REST, and GraphQL APIs to anything downstream — BI tools, custom applications, or AI agents. Cube Core is headless: it doesn't ship a UI, so you can build the analytics experience that fits your product. Cube Core works with all SQL data sources, including cloud data warehouses like Snowflake, Databricks, and BigQuery; query engines like Presto and Amazon Athena; and application databases like Postgres. It has a built in…
About seatunnel-web
Apache SeaTunnel SeaTunnel was formerly named Waterdrop , and renamed SeaTunnel since October 12, 2021. So, What we are? An open source web console to manage your seatunnel script, and would push them to any scheduling system easily. Click it if your want to know more about our design. 👉🏻Design Compatibility How to start Notice: Some details please refer to the docs/QuickStart.md 1 Preparing the Apache SeaTunnel environment Because SeaTunnel Web uses the SeaTunnel Java Client to submit jobs, running SeaTunnel Web requires preparing a SeaTunnel Zeta Engine service first. Based on the usage requirements of…
read the full seatunnel-web overview →
More in Data & Analytics
Related comparisons
More Data Engineering & Integration projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Engineering & Integration field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Cube or seatunnel-web more popular?
Cube has 21,147 GitHub stars and seatunnel-web has 888. Cube has the larger community by that measure.
Are Cube and seatunnel-web free?
Both are open source. Cube has no licence declared in this registry, and seatunnel-web is licensed under Apache-2.0. Both are free to self-host.
What is the difference between Cube and seatunnel-web?
Cube is written in Rust and seatunnel-web in Java. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Cube or seatunnel-web?
Choose Cube if you want the larger community (21,147 stars) or its Custom / other licence terms. Choose seatunnel-web if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.