head to head · open source

Nettacker vs crlfuzz

Nettacker has 5,614 GitHub stars, 1,184 forks, 249 open issues and last shipped yesterday. crlfuzz has 1,566 stars, 146 forks, 1 open issues and last shipped 26 days ago. Nettacker leads on adoption by 258% (5,614 vs 1,566 stars). Nettacker is written in Python under Apache-2.0; crlfuzz is written in Go under MIT. Nettacker has attracted 21% as many forks as stars, crlfuzz 9%. Nettacker was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Nettacker ★ 5.6K crlfuzz ★ 1.6K category Security & Privacy

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

Nettacker crlfuzz
GitHub stars ★ 5.6K ★ 1.6K
License Apache-2.0 MIT
Written in Python Go
Last push 2026-09-22 2026-08-28
Forks ⑂ 1.2K ⑂ 146
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Nettacker if

  • You weight community size — 5.6K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Nettacker profile →

pick crlfuzz if

  • You want the crlfuzz feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and crlfuzz fits your workflow better

full crlfuzz profile →

About Nettacker

OWASP Nettacker is an open source, Python based automated penetration testing and information gathering framework for cyber security professionals and ethical hackers who need to run reconnaissance, vulnerability assessment, and network security audits efficiently.

read the full Nettacker overview →

About crlfuzz

CRLFuzz is a fast, MIT licensed command line tool written in Go that scans web targets for CRLF injection vulnerabilities, aimed at penetration testers, bug bounty hunters, and security engineers who need to check either a single URL or a long list of them quickly.

read the full crlfuzz overview →

More in Security & Privacy

PayloadsAllTheThings ★ 81K Puter ★ 44K Mattermost ★ 39K Keycloak ★ 37K Tailscale ★ 37K HashiCorp Vault ★ 36K

Related comparisons

payloadsallthethings vs nettacker payloadsallthethings vs anthropic-cybersecurity-skills payloadsallthethings vs projectdiscovery payloadsallthethings vs pentagi payloadsallthethings vs pentestgpt payloadsallthethings vs osintgram payloadsallthethings vs vuls payloadsallthethings vs osv-scanner supabase vs better-auth keycloak vs jumpserver keycloak vs better-auth keycloak vs authelia keycloak vs authentik jumpserver vs better-auth jumpserver vs authelia better-auth vs authelia payloadsallthethings vs vault vaultwarden vs vault payloadsallthethings vs unkey payloadsallthethings vs phase payloadsallthethings vs keyshade puter vs vault mattermost vs vault keycloak vs vault

More Threat Detection & Response projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Threat Detection & Response field.

Nettacker vs PayloadsAllTheThings Nettacker vs Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills Nettacker vs ProjectDiscovery Nettacker vs pentagi Nettacker vs PentestGPT Nettacker vs Osintgram Nettacker vs thc-hydra Nettacker vs vuls Nettacker vs osv-scanner Nettacker vs rengine Nettacker vs reconftw Nettacker vs GDA-android-reversing-Tool

Frequently asked questions

Is Nettacker or crlfuzz more popular?

Nettacker has 5,614 GitHub stars and crlfuzz has 1,566. Nettacker has the larger community by that measure.

Are Nettacker and crlfuzz free?

Both are open source. Nettacker is licensed under Apache-2.0 and crlfuzz under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Nettacker and crlfuzz?

Nettacker is written in Python and crlfuzz in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Nettacker or crlfuzz?

Choose Nettacker if you want the larger community (5,614 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose crlfuzz if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.