head to head · open source
Crawl4AI vs wreq
Crawl4AI has 86,783 GitHub stars, 9,043 forks, 188 open issues and last shipped yesterday. wreq has 1,092 stars, 140 forks, 23 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Crawl4AI leads on adoption by 7,847% (86,783 vs 1,092 stars). Crawl4AI is written in Python under Apache-2.0; wreq is written in Rust under Apache-2.0. Crawl4AI has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, wreq 13%. Crawl4AI was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (crawler), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Crawl4AI | wreq | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 87K | ★ 1.1K |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Written in | Python | Rust |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-11-02 |
| Forks | ⑂ 9.0K | ⑂ 140 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Crawl4AI if
- You weight community size — 87K stars and counting
- You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick wreq if
- You want the wreq feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Rust
- You evaluated both and wreq fits your workflow better
About Crawl4AI
🚀🤖 Crawl4AI: Open source LLM Friendly Web Crawler & Scraper. 🚀 Crawl4AI Cloud API — Closed Beta (Launching Soon) Reliable, large scale web extraction, now built to be drastically more cost effective than any of the existing solutions. 👉 Apply here for early access We’ll be onboarding in phases and working closely with early users. Limited slots. Crawl4AI turns the web into clean, LLM ready Markdown for RAG, agents, and data pipelines. Fast, controllable, battle tested by a 50k+ star community. ✨ Check out latest update v0.9.3 ✨ New in v0.9.3 : Security release. Closes five coordinated disclosure advisories…
read the full Crawl4AI overview →
About wreq
wreq [![Discord chat][discord badge]][discord url] [discord badge]: [discord url]: 🚀 Help me work seamlessly with open source sharing by sponsoring me on GitHub An ergonomic and modular Rust HTTP Client for high fidelity protocol matching, featuring customizable TLS, JA3/JA4, and HTTP/2 signature capabilities. Features Plain bodies, JSON, urlencoded, multipart HTTP Trailer Cookie Store Redirect Policy Original Header Rotating Proxies Tower Middleware WebSocket Upgrade HTTPS via BoringSSL HTTP/2 over TLS Parity Certificate Store (CAs & mTLS) Multiple Runtime (Tokio, Compio) Example The following example uses the…
More in Data & Analytics
Related comparisons
More Data Extraction & Web Scraping projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Extraction & Web Scraping field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Crawl4AI or wreq more popular?
Crawl4AI has 86,783 GitHub stars and wreq has 1,092. Crawl4AI has the larger community by that measure.
Are Crawl4AI and wreq free?
Both are open source. Crawl4AI is licensed under Apache-2.0 and wreq under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Crawl4AI and wreq?
Crawl4AI is written in Python and wreq in Rust. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Crawl4AI or wreq?
Choose Crawl4AI if you want the larger community (86,783 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose wreq if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.