head to head · open source
Crawl4AI vs Scweet
Crawl4AI has 86,783 GitHub stars, 9,043 forks, 188 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Scweet has 1,658 stars, 287 forks, 1 open issues and last shipped 8 days ago. Crawl4AI leads on adoption by 5,134% (86,783 vs 1,658 stars). Crawl4AI is written in Python under Apache-2.0; Scweet is written in Python under MIT. Crawl4AI has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, Scweet 17%. Crawl4AI was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (python, scraper), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Crawl4AI | Scweet | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 87K | ★ 1.7K |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Written in | Python | Python |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-10-26 |
| Forks | ⑂ 9.0K | ⑂ 287 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Crawl4AI if
- You weight community size — 87K stars and counting
- You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick Scweet if
- You want the Scweet feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You evaluated both and Scweet fits your workflow better
About Crawl4AI
🚀🤖 Crawl4AI: Open source LLM Friendly Web Crawler & Scraper. 🚀 Crawl4AI Cloud API — Closed Beta (Launching Soon) Reliable, large scale web extraction, now built to be drastically more cost effective than any of the existing solutions. 👉 Apply here for early access We’ll be onboarding in phases and working closely with early users. Limited slots. Crawl4AI turns the web into clean, LLM ready Markdown for RAG, agents, and data pipelines. Fast, controllable, battle tested by a 50k+ star community. ✨ Check out latest update v0.9.3 ✨ New in v0.9.3 : Security release. Closes five coordinated disclosure advisories…
read the full Crawl4AI overview →
About Scweet
Scrape Twitter / X without the official API. Tweets, profiles, followers, trends and more. Two ways to run it 1. Hosted : nothing to manage ⭐ Runs on Apify. You do not need X accounts, cookies or proxies. Configure and run from your browser , no code needed, or drive it from code with the Python API Search tweets, profile timelines, follower / following lists Export in different formats ( JSON, CSV or XLSX ) Free tier included ; pay as you go pricing is on the Actor page 2. Self hosted : full control Bring your own X accounts and proxies. Run it from Python or the CLI, inside your own infrastructure. Both give…
read the full Scweet overview →
More in Data & Analytics
Related comparisons
More Data Extraction & Web Scraping projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Extraction & Web Scraping field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Crawl4AI or Scweet more popular?
Crawl4AI has 86,783 GitHub stars and Scweet has 1,658. Crawl4AI has the larger community by that measure.
Are Crawl4AI and Scweet free?
Both are open source. Crawl4AI is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Scweet under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Crawl4AI and Scweet?
Crawl4AI is written in Python and Scweet in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Crawl4AI or Scweet?
Choose Crawl4AI if you want the larger community (86,783 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose Scweet if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.