head to head · open source
Crawl4AI vs rebrowser-patches
Crawl4AI has 85,880 GitHub stars, 8,931 forks, 188 open issues and last shipped today. rebrowser-patches has 1,443 stars, 85 forks, 0 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Crawl4AI leads on adoption by 5,851% (85,880 vs 1,443 stars). Crawl4AI is written in Python under Apache-2.0; rebrowser-patches is written in JavaScript under MIT. Crawl4AI has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, rebrowser-patches 6%. Crawl4AI was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (crawler, playwright), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Crawl4AI | rebrowser-patches | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 86K | ★ 1.4K |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Written in | Python | JavaScript |
| Last push | 2026-10-20 | 2026-10-19 |
| Forks | ⑂ 8.9K | ⑂ 85 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Crawl4AI if
- You weight community size — 86K stars and counting
- You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick rebrowser-patches if
- You want the rebrowser-patches feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You evaluated both and rebrowser-patches fits your workflow better
About Crawl4AI
🚀🤖 Crawl4AI: Open source LLM Friendly Web Crawler & Scraper. 🚀 Crawl4AI Cloud API — Closed Beta (Launching Soon) Reliable, large scale web extraction, now built to be drastically more cost effective than any of the existing solutions. 👉 Apply here for early access We’ll be onboarding in phases and working closely with early users. Limited slots. Crawl4AI turns the web into clean, LLM ready Markdown for RAG, agents, and data pipelines. Fast, controllable, battle tested by a 50k+ star community. ✨ Check out latest update v0.9.3 ✨ New in v0.9.3 : Security release. Closes five coordinated disclosure advisories…
read the full Crawl4AI overview →
About rebrowser-patches
🪄 Patches for undetectable browser automation This repo contains patches to enhance popular web automation libraries. Specifically, it targets the puppeteer and playwright packages. Some aspects of automation libraries or browser behavior cannot be adjusted through settings or command line switches. Therefore, we fix these issues by patching the library's source code. While this approach is fragile and may break as the libraries' source code changes over time, the goal is to maintain this repo with community help to keep the patches up to date. Do I really need any patches? Out of the box Puppeteer and…
read the full rebrowser-patches overview →
More in Data & Analytics
Related comparisons
More Data Extraction & Web Scraping projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Extraction & Web Scraping field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Crawl4AI or rebrowser-patches more popular?
Crawl4AI has 85,880 GitHub stars and rebrowser-patches has 1,443. Crawl4AI has the larger community by that measure.
Are Crawl4AI and rebrowser-patches free?
Both are open source. Crawl4AI is licensed under Apache-2.0 and rebrowser-patches under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Crawl4AI and rebrowser-patches?
Crawl4AI is written in Python and rebrowser-patches in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Crawl4AI or rebrowser-patches?
Choose Crawl4AI if you want the larger community (85,880 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose rebrowser-patches if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.