head to head · open source
Crawl4AI vs proxy_pool
Crawl4AI has 86,783 GitHub stars, 9,043 forks, 188 open issues and last shipped yesterday. proxy_pool has 23,778 stars, 5,418 forks, 298 open issues and last shipped 5 months ago. Crawl4AI leads on adoption by 265% (86,783 vs 23,778 stars). Crawl4AI is written in Python under Apache-2.0; proxy_pool is written in Python under MIT. Crawl4AI has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, proxy_pool 23%. Crawl4AI was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (crawler), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Crawl4AI | proxy_pool | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 87K | ★ 24K |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Written in | Python | Python |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-06-15 |
| Forks | ⑂ 9.0K | ⑂ 5.4K |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Crawl4AI if
- You weight community size — 87K stars and counting
- You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick proxy_pool if
- You want the proxy_pool feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You evaluated both and proxy_pool fits your workflow better
About Crawl4AI
🚀🤖 Crawl4AI: Open source LLM Friendly Web Crawler & Scraper. 🚀 Crawl4AI Cloud API — Closed Beta (Launching Soon) Reliable, large scale web extraction, now built to be drastically more cost effective than any of the existing solutions. 👉 Apply here for early access We’ll be onboarding in phases and working closely with early users. Limited slots. Crawl4AI turns the web into clean, LLM ready Markdown for RAG, agents, and data pipelines. Fast, controllable, battle tested by a 50k+ star community. ✨ Check out latest update v0.9.3 ✨ New in v0.9.3 : Security release. Closes five coordinated disclosure advisories…
read the full Crawl4AI overview →
About proxy_pool
ProxyPool 爬虫代理IP池 ======= ( ) 0: try: html = requests.get(' proxies={"http": " 使用代理访问 return html except Exception: retry count = 1 删除代理池中代理 delete proxy(proxy) return None python from fetcher.baseFetcher import BaseFetcher from util.webRequest import WebRequest class MyProxyFetcher(BaseFetcher): """我的代理源""" name = "myproxy" url = " enabled = True def fetch(self): r = WebRequest().get(" for item in r.json: yield item["ip"] + ":" + item["port"] 2、添加好后， schedule 进程下次抓取时会自动扫描 fetcher/sources/ 目录并启用新代理源，无需修改配置。 可用 python proxyPool.py fetcher 命令查看当前启用的代理源列表。 如需临时禁用某个代理源，在 setting.py 的 PROXY FETCHER EXCLUDE 黑名单中添加其…
read the full proxy_pool overview →
More in Data & Analytics
Related comparisons
More Data Extraction & Web Scraping projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Extraction & Web Scraping field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Crawl4AI or proxy_pool more popular?
Crawl4AI has 86,783 GitHub stars and proxy_pool has 23,778. Crawl4AI has the larger community by that measure.
Are Crawl4AI and proxy_pool free?
Both are open source. Crawl4AI is licensed under Apache-2.0 and proxy_pool under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Crawl4AI and proxy_pool?
Crawl4AI is written in Python and proxy_pool in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Crawl4AI or proxy_pool?
Choose Crawl4AI if you want the larger community (86,783 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose proxy_pool if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.