head to head · open source
Crawl4AI vs faster-than-requests
Crawl4AI has 86,783 GitHub stars, 9,043 forks, 188 open issues and last shipped yesterday. faster-than-requests has 1,127 stars, 89 forks, 0 open issues and last shipped 28 days ago. Crawl4AI leads on adoption by 7,600% (86,783 vs 1,127 stars). Crawl4AI is written in Python under Apache-2.0; faster-than-requests is written in Nim under MIT. Crawl4AI has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, faster-than-requests 8%. Crawl4AI was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (python), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Crawl4AI | faster-than-requests | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 87K | ★ 1.1K |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Written in | Python | Nim |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-10-06 |
| Forks | ⑂ 9.0K | ⑂ 89 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Crawl4AI if
- You weight community size — 87K stars and counting
- You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick faster-than-requests if
- You want the faster-than-requests feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Nim
- You evaluated both and faster-than-requests fits your workflow better
About Crawl4AI
🚀🤖 Crawl4AI: Open source LLM Friendly Web Crawler & Scraper. 🚀 Crawl4AI Cloud API — Closed Beta (Launching Soon) Reliable, large scale web extraction, now built to be drastically more cost effective than any of the existing solutions. 👉 Apply here for early access We’ll be onboarding in phases and working closely with early users. Limited slots. Crawl4AI turns the web into clean, LLM ready Markdown for RAG, agents, and data pipelines. Fast, controllable, battle tested by a 50k+ star community. ✨ Check out latest update v0.9.3 ✨ New in v0.9.3 : Security release. Closes five coordinated disclosure advisories…
read the full Crawl4AI overview →
About faster-than-requests
Faster than Requests Lines Of Code counted using CLOC. Direct dependencies of the package when ready to run. Benchmarks run on Docker from Dockerfile on this repo. Developers counted from the Contributors list of Git. Speed is IRL time to complete 10000 HTTP local requests. Stats as of year 2020. x86 64 64Bit AMD, SSD, Arch Linux. Use Table Of Contents get() Description: Takes an URL string, makes an HTTP GET and returns a dict with the response. Arguments: url the remote URL, string type, required, must not be empty string, example user agent User Agent, string type, optional, should not be empty string. max…
read the full faster-than-requests overview →
More in Data & Analytics
Related comparisons
More Data Extraction & Web Scraping projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Extraction & Web Scraping field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Crawl4AI or faster-than-requests more popular?
Crawl4AI has 86,783 GitHub stars and faster-than-requests has 1,127. Crawl4AI has the larger community by that measure.
Are Crawl4AI and faster-than-requests free?
Both are open source. Crawl4AI is licensed under Apache-2.0 and faster-than-requests under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Crawl4AI and faster-than-requests?
Crawl4AI is written in Python and faster-than-requests in Nim. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Crawl4AI or faster-than-requests?
Choose Crawl4AI if you want the larger community (86,783 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose faster-than-requests if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.