head to head · open source
Cherry Studio vs CosyVoice
Cherry Studio has 53,202 GitHub stars, 5,164 forks, 1,514 open issues and last shipped yesterday. CosyVoice has 24,247 stars, 2,769 forks, 698 open issues and last shipped 5 months ago. Cherry Studio leads on adoption by 119% (53,202 vs 24,247 stars). Cherry Studio is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0; CosyVoice is written in Python under Apache-2.0. Cherry Studio has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, CosyVoice 11%. Cherry Studio was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Cherry Studio | CosyVoice | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 53K | ★ 24K |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Written in | TypeScript | Python |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-05-25 |
| Forks | ⑂ 5.2K | ⑂ 2.8K |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Cherry Studio if
- You weight community size — 53K stars and counting
- You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick CosyVoice if
- You want the CosyVoice feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You evaluated both and CosyVoice fits your workflow better
About Cherry Studio
English Official Site Documents Development Feedback [![][deepwiki shield]][deepwiki link] [![][twitter shield]][twitter link] [![][discord shield]][discord link] [![][telegram shield]][telegram link] [![][github release shield]][github release link] [![][github nightly shield]][github nightly link] [![][github contributors shield]][github contributors link] [![][license shield]][license link] [![][commercial shield]][commercial link] [![][sponsor shield]][sponsor link] 🍒 Cherry Studio Cherry Studio is a desktop client that supports multiple LLM providers, available on Windows, Mac and Linux. 👏 Join Telegram…
read the full Cherry Studio overview →
About CosyVoice
👉🏻 CosyVoice 👈🏻 Fun CosyVoice 3.0 : Demos; Paper; Modelscope; Huggingface; CV3 Eval CosyVoice 2.0 : Demos; Paper; Modelscope; HuggingFace CosyVoice 1.0 : Demos; Paper; Modelscope; HuggingFace Highlight🔥 Fun CosyVoice 3.0 is an advanced text to speech (TTS) system based on large language models (LLM), surpassing its predecessor (CosyVoice 2.0) in content consistency, speaker similarity, and prosody naturalness. It is designed for zero shot multilingual speech synthesis in the wild. Key Features Language Coverage : Covers 9 common languages (Chinese, English, Japanese, Korean, German, Spanish, French…
read the full CosyVoice overview →
More in AI & Machine Learning
Related comparisons
More AI Interaction & Interfaces projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Interaction & Interfaces field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Cherry Studio or CosyVoice more popular?
Cherry Studio has 53,202 GitHub stars and CosyVoice has 24,247. Cherry Studio has the larger community by that measure.
Are Cherry Studio and CosyVoice free?
Both are open source. Cherry Studio is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and CosyVoice under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Cherry Studio and CosyVoice?
Cherry Studio is written in TypeScript and CosyVoice in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Cherry Studio or CosyVoice?
Choose Cherry Studio if you want the larger community (53,202 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose CosyVoice if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.