head to head · open source
ComfyUI vs magentic
ComfyUI has 144,907 GitHub stars, 17,244 forks, 4,894 open issues and last shipped yesterday. magentic has 2,428 stars, 133 forks, 50 open issues and last shipped 5 days ago. ComfyUI leads on adoption by 5,868% (144,907 vs 2,428 stars). ComfyUI is written in Python under GPL-3.0; magentic is written in Python under MIT. ComfyUI has attracted 12% as many forks as stars, magentic 5%. ComfyUI was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (ai), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| ComfyUI | magentic | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 145K | ★ 2.4K |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Written in | Python | Python |
| Last push | 2026-11-04 | 2026-10-31 |
| Forks | ⑂ 17K | ⑂ 133 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick ComfyUI if
- You weight community size — 145K stars and counting
- You want the GPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick magentic if
- You want the magentic feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You evaluated both and magentic fits your workflow better
About ComfyUI
ComfyUI The most powerful and modular AI engine for content creation. [![Website][website shield]][website url] [![Dynamic JSON Badge][discord shield]][discord url] [![Twitter][twitter shield]][twitter url] [![Matrix][matrix shield]][matrix url] [![][github release shield]][github release link] [![][github release date shield]][github release link] [![][github downloads shield]][github downloads link] [![][github downloads latest shield]][github downloads link] [matrix shield]: [matrix url]: [website shield]: [website url]: [discord shield]: [discord url]: [twitter shield]: [twitter url]: [github release…
read the full ComfyUI overview →
About magentic
magentic Seamlessly integrate Large Language Models into Python code. Use the @prompt and @chatprompt decorators to create functions that return structured output from an LLM. Combine LLM queries and tool use with traditional Python code to build complex agentic systems. Features [Structured Outputs] using pydantic models and built in python types. [Streaming] of structured outputs and function calls, to use them while being generated. [LLM Assisted Retries] to improve LLM adherence to complex output schemas. [Observability] using OpenTelemetry, with native [Pydantic Logfire integration]. [Type Annotations] to…
read the full magentic overview →
More in AI & Machine Learning
Related comparisons
More AI Interaction & Interfaces projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Interaction & Interfaces field.
Frequently asked questions
Is ComfyUI or magentic more popular?
ComfyUI has 144,907 GitHub stars and magentic has 2,428. ComfyUI has the larger community by that measure.
Are ComfyUI and magentic free?
Both are open source. ComfyUI is licensed under GPL-3.0 and magentic under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between ComfyUI and magentic?
ComfyUI is written in Python and magentic in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, ComfyUI or magentic?
Choose ComfyUI if you want the larger community (144,907 stars) or its GPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose magentic if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.