head to head · open source

ComfyUI vs magentic

ComfyUI has 133,963 GitHub stars, 15,874 forks, 4,894 open issues and last shipped today. magentic has 2,425 stars, 127 forks, 50 open issues and last shipped 6 months ago. ComfyUI leads on adoption by 5,424% (133,963 vs 2,425 stars). ComfyUI is written in Python under GPL-3.0; magentic is written in Python under MIT. ComfyUI has attracted 12% as many forks as stars, magentic 5%. ComfyUI was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (ai), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

ComfyUI ★ 134K magentic ★ 2.4K category AI & Machine Learning

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

ComfyUI magentic
GitHub stars ★ 134K ★ 2.4K
License GPL-3.0 MIT
Written in Python Python
Last push 2026-09-20 2026-03-11
Forks ⑂ 16K ⑂ 127
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick ComfyUI if

  • You weight community size — 134K stars and counting
  • You want the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full ComfyUI profile →

pick magentic if

  • You want the magentic feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You evaluated both and magentic fits your workflow better

full magentic profile →

About ComfyUI

ComfyUI is a GPL 3.0 licensed Python and PyTorch node graph application, local API, and backend for running diffusion models across image, video, audio, 3D, and text workflows, built for visual professionals who want control over every model, parameter, and output, and for developers who embed those workflows into production pipelines.

read the full ComfyUI overview →

About magentic

magentic is an MIT licensed Python library that turns Large Language Model prompts into typed Python functions through the @prompt and @chatprompt decorators, aimed at Python developers who need structured, agentic LLM behavior inside ordinary application code.

read the full magentic overview →

More in AI & Machine Learning

OpenClaw ★ 390K Hermes Agent ★ 247K Ollama ★ 181K Dify ★ 157K Open WebUI ★ 153K langchain ★ 147K

Related comparisons

openclaw vs comfyui openclaw vs hermes-agent openclaw vs opencode openclaw vs n8n openclaw vs open-webui openclaw vs odysseus openclaw vs lobechat openclaw vs anythingllm openclaw vs ollama ollama vs llama-cpp ollama vs vllm ollama vs odysseus ollama vs gpt4all ollama vs llama-index ollama vs localai open-webui vs gpt4all openclaw vs dify openclaw vs multica openclaw vs langgraph n8n vs dify dify vs langflow dify vs open-webui dify vs langchain dify vs ponytail

More AI Interaction & Interfaces projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Interaction & Interfaces field.

ComfyUI vs OpenClaw ComfyUI vs Hermes Agent ComfyUI vs Open WebUI ComfyUI vs odysseus ComfyUI vs LobeChat ComfyUI vs AnythingLLM ComfyUI vs Cherry Studio ComfyUI vs nanobot ComfyUI vs Jan ComfyUI vs LibreChat ComfyUI vs chatbox ComfyUI vs AstrBot

Frequently asked questions

Is ComfyUI or magentic more popular?

ComfyUI has 133,963 GitHub stars and magentic has 2,425. ComfyUI has the larger community by that measure.

Are ComfyUI and magentic free?

Both are open source. ComfyUI is licensed under GPL-3.0 and magentic under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between ComfyUI and magentic?

ComfyUI is written in Python and magentic in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, ComfyUI or magentic?

Choose ComfyUI if you want the larger community (133,963 stars) or its GPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose magentic if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.