head to head · open source
ComfyUI vs ctxport
ComfyUI has 144,907 GitHub stars, 17,244 forks, 4,894 open issues and last shipped yesterday. ctxport has 653 stars, 135 forks, 9 open issues and last shipped 8 months ago. ComfyUI leads on adoption by 22,091% (144,907 vs 653 stars). ComfyUI is written in Python under GPL-3.0; ctxport is written in TypeScript under MIT. ComfyUI has attracted 12% as many forks as stars, ctxport 21%. ComfyUI was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (ai), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| ComfyUI | ctxport | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 145K | ★ 653 |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Written in | Python | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-11-04 | 2026-03-04 |
| Forks | ⑂ 17K | ⑂ 135 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick ComfyUI if
- You weight community size — 145K stars and counting
- You want the GPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick ctxport if
- You want the ctxport feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and ctxport fits your workflow better
About ComfyUI
ComfyUI The most powerful and modular AI engine for content creation. [![Website][website shield]][website url] [![Dynamic JSON Badge][discord shield]][discord url] [![Twitter][twitter shield]][twitter url] [![Matrix][matrix shield]][matrix url] [![][github release shield]][github release link] [![][github release date shield]][github release link] [![][github downloads shield]][github downloads link] [![][github downloads latest shield]][github downloads link] [matrix shield]: [matrix url]: [website shield]: [website url]: [discord shield]: [discord url]: [twitter shield]: [twitter url]: [github release…
read the full ComfyUI overview →
About ctxport
CtxPort One click. Structured Markdown. Any AI conversation. Your AI conversations deserve a better clipboard. 简体中文 English Supported Platforms Get Started · Features · Documentation The Problem You just spent 45 minutes in a deep conversation with ChatGPT. You found the perfect architecture for your project. Now you need to share it with Claude for implementation. What do you do? Ctrl+A, Ctrl+C? You get a mess of HTML artifacts, broken formatting, and missing code blocks. Copy each message manually? Life is too short. Screenshot it? Text in images is where knowledge goes to die. AI conversations are the new…
read the full ctxport overview →
More in AI & Machine Learning
Related comparisons
More AI Interaction & Interfaces projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Interaction & Interfaces field.
Frequently asked questions
Is ComfyUI or ctxport more popular?
ComfyUI has 144,907 GitHub stars and ctxport has 653. ComfyUI has the larger community by that measure.
Are ComfyUI and ctxport free?
Both are open source. ComfyUI is licensed under GPL-3.0 and ctxport under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between ComfyUI and ctxport?
ComfyUI is written in Python and ctxport in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, ComfyUI or ctxport?
Choose ComfyUI if you want the larger community (144,907 stars) or its GPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose ctxport if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.