head to head · open source

ComfyUI vs codex-mobile

ComfyUI has 133,963 GitHub stars, 15,874 forks, 4,894 open issues and last shipped today. codex-mobile has 928 stars, 190 forks, 44 open issues and last shipped today. ComfyUI leads on adoption by 14,336% (133,963 vs 928 stars). ComfyUI is written in Python under GPL-3.0; codex-mobile is written in TypeScript under MIT. ComfyUI has attracted 12% as many forks as stars, codex-mobile 20%. ComfyUI was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

ComfyUI ★ 134K codex-mobile ★ 928 category AI & Machine Learning

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

ComfyUI codex-mobile
GitHub stars ★ 134K ★ 928
License GPL-3.0 MIT
Written in Python TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-20 2026-09-20
Forks ⑂ 16K ⑂ 190
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick ComfyUI if

  • You weight community size — 134K stars and counting
  • You want the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full ComfyUI profile →

pick codex-mobile if

  • You want the codex-mobile feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and codex-mobile fits your workflow better

full codex-mobile profile →

About ComfyUI

ComfyUI is a GPL 3.0 licensed Python and PyTorch node graph application, local API, and backend for running diffusion models across image, video, audio, 3D, and text workflows, built for visual professionals who want control over every model, parameter, and output, and for developers who embed those workflows into production pipelines.

read the full ComfyUI overview →

About codex-mobile

codex mobile is a TypeScript project, published to npm as codexapp under the MIT licence, that serves the Codex app UI in a web browser from Linux, Windows, or a Termux session on Android, and it is aimed at developers who want to reach their Codex coding sessions from a phone, a tablet, or another machine on the same network.

read the full codex-mobile overview →

More in AI & Machine Learning

OpenClaw ★ 390K Hermes Agent ★ 247K Ollama ★ 181K Dify ★ 157K Open WebUI ★ 153K langchain ★ 147K

Related comparisons

openclaw vs comfyui openclaw vs hermes-agent openclaw vs opencode openclaw vs n8n openclaw vs open-webui openclaw vs odysseus openclaw vs lobechat openclaw vs anythingllm openclaw vs ollama ollama vs llama-cpp ollama vs vllm ollama vs odysseus ollama vs gpt4all ollama vs llama-index ollama vs localai open-webui vs gpt4all openclaw vs dify openclaw vs multica openclaw vs langgraph n8n vs dify dify vs langflow dify vs open-webui dify vs langchain dify vs ponytail

More AI Interaction & Interfaces projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Interaction & Interfaces field.

ComfyUI vs OpenClaw ComfyUI vs Hermes Agent ComfyUI vs Open WebUI ComfyUI vs odysseus ComfyUI vs LobeChat ComfyUI vs AnythingLLM ComfyUI vs Cherry Studio ComfyUI vs nanobot ComfyUI vs Jan ComfyUI vs LibreChat ComfyUI vs chatbox ComfyUI vs AstrBot

Frequently asked questions

Is ComfyUI or codex-mobile more popular?

ComfyUI has 133,963 GitHub stars and codex-mobile has 928. ComfyUI has the larger community by that measure.

Are ComfyUI and codex-mobile free?

Both are open source. ComfyUI is licensed under GPL-3.0 and codex-mobile under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between ComfyUI and codex-mobile?

ComfyUI is written in Python and codex-mobile in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, ComfyUI or codex-mobile?

Choose ComfyUI if you want the larger community (133,963 stars) or its GPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose codex-mobile if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.