head to head · open source
ComfyUI vs chatgpt_telegram_bot
ComfyUI has 145,017 GitHub stars, 17,260 forks, 4,894 open issues and last shipped yesterday. chatgpt_telegram_bot has 5,552 stars, 1,907 forks, 56 open issues and last shipped 5 months ago. ComfyUI leads on adoption by 2,512% (145,017 vs 5,552 stars). ComfyUI is written in Python under GPL-3.0; chatgpt_telegram_bot is written in Python under MIT. ComfyUI has attracted 12% as many forks as stars, chatgpt_telegram_bot 34%. ComfyUI was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (python), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| ComfyUI | chatgpt_telegram_bot | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 145K | ★ 5.6K |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Written in | Python | Python |
| Last push | 2026-11-04 | 2026-06-14 |
| Forks | ⑂ 17K | ⑂ 1.9K |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick ComfyUI if
- You weight community size — 145K stars and counting
- You want the GPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick chatgpt_telegram_bot if
- You want the chatgpt_telegram_bot feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You evaluated both and chatgpt_telegram_bot fits your workflow better
About ComfyUI
ComfyUI The most powerful and modular AI engine for content creation. [![Website][website shield]][website url] [![Dynamic JSON Badge][discord shield]][discord url] [![Twitter][twitter shield]][twitter url] [![Matrix][matrix shield]][matrix url] [![][github release shield]][github release link] [![][github release date shield]][github release link] [![][github downloads shield]][github downloads link] [![][github downloads latest shield]][github downloads link] [matrix shield]: [matrix url]: [website shield]: [website url]: [discord shield]: [discord url]: [twitter shield]: [twitter url]: [github release…
read the full ComfyUI overview →
About chatgpt_telegram_bot
🤖 ChatGPT Telegram Bot ChatGPT, re created as a Telegram bot — and it works great. GPT 5.5 · Anthropic Claude (Opus / Sonnet / Haiku) · Vision · Voice · Image generation Fast replies, no daily limits, message streaming and 15 special chat modes. Web chatbots are great — but they're often laggy, rate limited, and locked behind a browser tab. This project puts the best models from OpenAI and Anthropic right inside Telegram , with your own API keys and no daily limits. 🚀 Try the live bot: @jadvebot · 🌐 Web: jadve.com — or deploy your own in two commands (Quick start ↓). ✨ Features ⚡ Low latency — replies usually…
read the full chatgpt_telegram_bot overview →
More in AI & Machine Learning
Related comparisons
More AI Interaction & Interfaces projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Interaction & Interfaces field.
Frequently asked questions
Is ComfyUI or chatgpt_telegram_bot more popular?
ComfyUI has 145,017 GitHub stars and chatgpt_telegram_bot has 5,552. ComfyUI has the larger community by that measure.
Are ComfyUI and chatgpt_telegram_bot free?
Both are open source. ComfyUI is licensed under GPL-3.0 and chatgpt_telegram_bot under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between ComfyUI and chatgpt_telegram_bot?
ComfyUI is written in Python and chatgpt_telegram_bot in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, ComfyUI or chatgpt_telegram_bot?
Choose ComfyUI if you want the larger community (145,017 stars) or its GPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose chatgpt_telegram_bot if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.