head to head · open source

ComfyUI vs chatgpt-android

ComfyUI has 133,963 GitHub stars, 15,874 forks, 4,894 open issues and last shipped today. chatgpt-android has 3,870 stars, 447 forks, 27 open issues and last shipped 9 months ago. ComfyUI leads on adoption by 3,362% (133,963 vs 3,870 stars). ComfyUI is written in Python under GPL-3.0; chatgpt-android is written in Kotlin under Apache-2.0. ComfyUI has attracted 12% as many forks as stars, chatgpt-android 12%. ComfyUI was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

ComfyUI ★ 134K chatgpt-android ★ 3.9K category AI & Machine Learning

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

ComfyUI chatgpt-android
GitHub stars ★ 134K ★ 3.9K
License GPL-3.0 Apache-2.0
Written in Python Kotlin
Last push 2026-09-20 2026-01-03
Forks ⑂ 16K ⑂ 447
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick ComfyUI if

  • You weight community size — 134K stars and counting
  • You want the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full ComfyUI profile →

pick chatgpt-android if

  • You want the chatgpt-android feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Kotlin
  • You evaluated both and chatgpt-android fits your workflow better

full chatgpt-android profile →

About ComfyUI

ComfyUI is a GPL 3.0 licensed Python and PyTorch node graph application, local API, and backend for running diffusion models across image, video, audio, 3D, and text workflows, built for visual professionals who want control over every model, parameter, and output, and for developers who embed those workflows into production pipelines.

read the full ComfyUI overview →

About chatgpt-android

ChatGPT Android is an open source Kotlin sample application that demonstrates OpenAI's ChatGPT chat API on Android inside a chatbot interface built with Jetpack Compose and the Stream Chat SDK for Compose, aimed at Android developers who want a working reference rather than a blank project.

read the full chatgpt-android overview →

More in AI & Machine Learning

OpenClaw ★ 390K Hermes Agent ★ 247K Ollama ★ 181K Dify ★ 157K Open WebUI ★ 153K langchain ★ 147K

Related comparisons

openclaw vs comfyui openclaw vs hermes-agent openclaw vs opencode openclaw vs n8n openclaw vs open-webui openclaw vs odysseus openclaw vs lobechat openclaw vs anythingllm openclaw vs ollama ollama vs llama-cpp ollama vs vllm ollama vs odysseus ollama vs gpt4all ollama vs llama-index ollama vs localai open-webui vs gpt4all openclaw vs dify openclaw vs multica openclaw vs langgraph n8n vs dify dify vs langflow dify vs open-webui dify vs langchain dify vs ponytail

More AI Interaction & Interfaces projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Interaction & Interfaces field.

ComfyUI vs OpenClaw ComfyUI vs Hermes Agent ComfyUI vs Open WebUI ComfyUI vs odysseus ComfyUI vs LobeChat ComfyUI vs AnythingLLM ComfyUI vs Cherry Studio ComfyUI vs nanobot ComfyUI vs Jan ComfyUI vs LibreChat ComfyUI vs chatbox ComfyUI vs AstrBot

Frequently asked questions

Is ComfyUI or chatgpt-android more popular?

ComfyUI has 133,963 GitHub stars and chatgpt-android has 3,870. ComfyUI has the larger community by that measure.

Are ComfyUI and chatgpt-android free?

Both are open source. ComfyUI is licensed under GPL-3.0 and chatgpt-android under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between ComfyUI and chatgpt-android?

ComfyUI is written in Python and chatgpt-android in Kotlin. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, ComfyUI or chatgpt-android?

Choose ComfyUI if you want the larger community (133,963 stars) or its GPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose chatgpt-android if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.