head to head · open source

CL4R1T4S vs cangjie-skill

CL4R1T4S has 51,737 GitHub stars, 10,551 forks, 127 open issues and last shipped 1 months ago. cangjie-skill has 12,051 stars, 1,417 forks, 23 open issues and last shipped 1 months ago. CL4R1T4S leads on adoption by 329% (51,737 vs 12,051 stars). CL4R1T4S is written in various languages under AGPL-3.0; cangjie-skill is written in Python under MIT. CL4R1T4S has attracted 20% as many forks as stars, cangjie-skill 12%. cangjie-skill was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (prompt-engineering), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

CL4R1T4S ★ 52K cangjie-skill ★ 12K category AI & Machine Learning

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

CL4R1T4S cangjie-skill
GitHub stars ★ 52K ★ 12K
License AGPL-3.0 MIT
Written in — Python
Last push 2026-09-22 2026-10-02
Forks ⑂ 11K ⑂ 1.4K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick CL4R1T4S if

  • You weight community size — 52K stars and counting
  • You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full CL4R1T4S profile →

pick cangjie-skill if

  • You want the cangjie-skill feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You evaluated both and cangjie-skill fits your workflow better

full cangjie-skill profile →

About CL4R1T4S

CL4R1T4S AI SYSTEMS TRANSPARENCY AND OBSERVABILITY FOR ALL! Full extracted system prompts, guidelines, and tools from OpenAI, Google, Anthropic, xAI, Perplexity, Cursor, Windsurf, Devin, Manus, Replit, and more – virtually all major AI models + agents! 📌 Why This Exists "In order to trust the output, one must understand the input." AI labs shape how models behave using massive, unseen prompt scaffolds. Because AI is a trusted external intelligence layer for a growing number of humans, these hidden instructions can affect the perceptions and behavior of the public. These prompts define: What AIs can’t say What…

read the full CL4R1T4S overview →

About cangjie-skill

简体中文 · English · 日本語 Cangjie Skill Distill methodologies from books, long form videos, and podcasts into callable AI Skills Finish reading, watching, or listening—and leave with a methodology you can invoke. Official Website 🌐 Visit the Cangjie Skill official website The website provides visual Skill Pack browsing, a beginner friendly usage guide, Skill detail pages, and a contribution submission entry. This GitHub repository remains the sole source for cangjie skill code, methodology, and templates; the website provides presentation, navigation, and usage guidance. What's New in v2.5.0 Capability Bundle as the…

read the full cangjie-skill overview →

More in AI & Machine Learning

Related comparisons

More AI Development Platforms projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Development Platforms field.

Frequently asked questions

Is CL4R1T4S or cangjie-skill more popular?

CL4R1T4S has 51,737 GitHub stars and cangjie-skill has 12,051. CL4R1T4S has the larger community by that measure.

Are CL4R1T4S and cangjie-skill free?

Both are open source. CL4R1T4S is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and cangjie-skill under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between CL4R1T4S and cangjie-skill?

CL4R1T4S is written in various languages and cangjie-skill in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, CL4R1T4S or cangjie-skill?

Choose CL4R1T4S if you want the larger community (51,737 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose cangjie-skill if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.