head to head · open source

CL4R1T4S vs cangjie-skill

CL4R1T4S has 50,059 GitHub stars, 10,280 forks, 127 open issues and last shipped 10 days ago. cangjie-skill has 10,331 stars, 1,198 forks, 23 open issues and last shipped 7 days ago. CL4R1T4S leads on adoption by 385% (50,059 vs 10,331 stars). CL4R1T4S is written in various languages under AGPL-3.0; cangjie-skill is written in Python under MIT. CL4R1T4S has attracted 21% as many forks as stars, cangjie-skill 12%. cangjie-skill was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (prompt-engineering), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

CL4R1T4S ★ 50K cangjie-skill ★ 10K category AI & Machine Learning

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

CL4R1T4S cangjie-skill
GitHub stars ★ 50K ★ 10K
License AGPL-3.0 MIT
Written in Python
Last push 2026-09-10 2026-09-13
Forks ⑂ 10K ⑂ 1.2K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick CL4R1T4S if

  • You weight community size — 50K stars and counting
  • You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full CL4R1T4S profile →

pick cangjie-skill if

  • You want the cangjie-skill feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You evaluated both and cangjie-skill fits your workflow better

full cangjie-skill profile →

About CL4R1T4S

CL4R1T4S is an AGPL 3.0 repository of full extracted system prompts, guidelines and tools from the major AI models and agents — ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Grok, Perplexity, Cursor, Lovable, Replit and more — for anyone who wants to know what instructions sit behind the AI systems they use.

read the full CL4R1T4S overview →

About cangjie-skill

Cangjie Skill is an MIT licensed Python tool that distills methodologies from books, long form videos, and podcasts into callable AI Skills, built for developers and knowledge workers who assemble agent workflows on OpenClaw, Claude Code, or DeepSeek Harness.

read the full cangjie-skill overview →

More in AI & Machine Learning

OpenClaw ★ 390K Hermes Agent ★ 247K Ollama ★ 181K Dify ★ 157K Open WebUI ★ 153K langchain ★ 147K

Related comparisons

openclaw vs dify openclaw vs multica openclaw vs langgraph n8n vs dify dify vs langflow dify vs open-webui dify vs langchain dify vs ponytail openclaw vs hermes-agent openclaw vs opencode openclaw vs n8n openclaw vs open-webui openclaw vs comfyui openclaw vs odysseus openclaw vs lobechat openclaw vs anythingllm openclaw vs ollama ollama vs llama-cpp ollama vs vllm ollama vs odysseus ollama vs gpt4all ollama vs llama-index ollama vs localai open-webui vs gpt4all

More AI Development Platforms projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Development Platforms field.

CL4R1T4S vs Dify CL4R1T4S vs langchain CL4R1T4S vs ponytail CL4R1T4S vs generative-ai-for-beginners CL4R1T4S vs graphify CL4R1T4S vs claude-mem CL4R1T4S vs ragflow CL4R1T4S vs PaddleOCR CL4R1T4S vs Agent-Reach CL4R1T4S vs headroom CL4R1T4S vs Mem0 CL4R1T4S vs daily_stock_analysis

Frequently asked questions

Is CL4R1T4S or cangjie-skill more popular?

CL4R1T4S has 50,059 GitHub stars and cangjie-skill has 10,331. CL4R1T4S has the larger community by that measure.

Are CL4R1T4S and cangjie-skill free?

Both are open source. CL4R1T4S is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and cangjie-skill under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between CL4R1T4S and cangjie-skill?

CL4R1T4S is written in various languages and cangjie-skill in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, CL4R1T4S or cangjie-skill?

Choose CL4R1T4S if you want the larger community (50,059 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose cangjie-skill if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.