head to head · open source
Cherry Studio vs repomix
Cherry Studio has 53,202 GitHub stars, 5,164 forks, 1,514 open issues and last shipped yesterday. repomix has 29,122 stars, 1,615 forks, 138 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. Cherry Studio leads on adoption by 83% (53,202 vs 29,122 stars). Cherry Studio is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0; repomix is written in TypeScript under MIT. Cherry Studio has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, repomix 6%. Cherry Studio was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Cherry Studio | repomix | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 53K | ★ 29K |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Written in | TypeScript | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-11-01 |
| Forks | ⑂ 5.2K | ⑂ 1.6K |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Cherry Studio if
- You weight community size — 53K stars and counting
- You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick repomix if
- You want the repomix feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and repomix fits your workflow better
About Cherry Studio
English Official Site Documents Development Feedback [![][deepwiki shield]][deepwiki link] [![][twitter shield]][twitter link] [![][discord shield]][discord link] [![][telegram shield]][telegram link] [![][github release shield]][github release link] [![][github nightly shield]][github nightly link] [![][github contributors shield]][github contributors link] [![][license shield]][license link] [![][commercial shield]][commercial link] [![][sponsor shield]][sponsor link] 🍒 Cherry Studio Cherry Studio is a desktop client that supports multiple LLM providers, available on Windows, Mac and Linux. 👏 Join Telegram…
read the full Cherry Studio overview →
About repomix
Special thanks to: Warp, built for coding with multiple AI agents Available for MacOS, Linux, & Windows CodeRabbit AI Code Reviews Cut code review time & bugs in half, instantly. Pack your codebase into AI friendly formats Use Repomix online! 👉 repomix.com Need discussion? Join us on Discord ! Share your experience and tips Stay updated on new features Get help with configuration and usage 📦 Repomix is a powerful tool that packs your entire repository into a single, AI friendly file. It is perfect for when you need to feed your codebase to Large Language Models (LLMs) or other AI tools like Claude, ChatGPT…
read the full repomix overview →
More in AI & Machine Learning
Related comparisons
More AI Interaction & Interfaces projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Interaction & Interfaces field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Cherry Studio or repomix more popular?
Cherry Studio has 53,202 GitHub stars and repomix has 29,122. Cherry Studio has the larger community by that measure.
Are Cherry Studio and repomix free?
Both are open source. Cherry Studio is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and repomix under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Cherry Studio and repomix?
Cherry Studio is written in TypeScript and repomix in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Cherry Studio or repomix?
Choose Cherry Studio if you want the larger community (53,202 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose repomix if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.