head to head · open source
Cherry Studio vs Proma
Cherry Studio has 53,202 GitHub stars, 5,164 forks, 1,514 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Proma has 2,237 stars, 306 forks, 202 open issues and last shipped 1 months ago. Cherry Studio leads on adoption by 2,278% (53,202 vs 2,237 stars). Cherry Studio is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0; Proma is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0. Cherry Studio has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, Proma 14%. Cherry Studio was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (llm), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Cherry Studio | Proma | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 53K | ★ 2.2K |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Written in | TypeScript | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-09-26 |
| Forks | ⑂ 5.2K | ⑂ 306 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Cherry Studio if
- You weight community size — 53K stars and counting
- You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick Proma if
- You want the Proma feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and Proma fits your workflow better
About Cherry Studio
English Official Site Documents Development Feedback [![][deepwiki shield]][deepwiki link] [![][twitter shield]][twitter link] [![][discord shield]][discord link] [![][telegram shield]][telegram link] [![][github release shield]][github release link] [![][github nightly shield]][github nightly link] [![][github contributors shield]][github contributors link] [![][license shield]][license link] [![][commercial shield]][commercial link] [![][sponsor shield]][sponsor link] 🍒 Cherry Studio Cherry Studio is a desktop client that supports multiple LLM providers, available on Windows, Mac and Linux. 👏 Join Telegram…
read the full Cherry Studio overview →
About Proma
Proma Proma 简介 欢迎访问 查看更完整的介绍。 Proma 是一款为专业用户打造的开源通用的桌面端 Agent 产品。功能涵盖了主流 Agent 具备的所有功能，包括 Chat 模式 Agent 模式 计划模式 项目分区 记忆能力 内嵌浏览器 内嵌终端 定时任务 Agent 平行探索 子会话 & 主会话 Skills / MCP / CLI 远程链接支持：微信、飞书、钉钉、Slack 各种文件的预览和编辑能力 专业用户场景 并为专业用户场景增加了很多专门适配的功能，辅助 Agent 可以更顺畅地完成对专业场景的支持，以下的所有功能都是跟 Agent 打通并且丝滑适配： Todo：方便任务在完成一半时先记一下，后续可以直接在输入框引用继续工作；或通过 Agent 一起创办 Todo 完成日常提醒，还可以跟 macOS 的提醒事项相互同步 日程：方便 Agent 也可以帮助你创建和管理日程，避免重要事件在日程上的冲突，同样可以跟 Agent 协作，并且也一样跟 macOS 的日历相互同步 Obsidian：深度集成了 Obsidian，比 Obsidian 更好的 markdown 实时编辑体验，为专业的知识管理、知识创造和研究型用户提供最丝滑的 Agent 交互体验 内嵌终端与浏览器：可以允许 Agent 直接登录并使用的可见终端和浏览器，丝滑应对编程场景和自动化任务等场景 Agent…
read the full Proma overview →
More in AI & Machine Learning
Related comparisons
More AI Interaction & Interfaces projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Interaction & Interfaces field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Cherry Studio or Proma more popular?
Cherry Studio has 53,202 GitHub stars and Proma has 2,237. Cherry Studio has the larger community by that measure.
Are Cherry Studio and Proma free?
Both are open source. Cherry Studio is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Proma under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Cherry Studio and Proma?
Cherry Studio is written in TypeScript and Proma in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Cherry Studio or Proma?
Choose Cherry Studio if you want the larger community (53,202 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose Proma if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.