head to head · open source

Cherry Studio vs jev-chat-jarvis

Cherry Studio has 53,524 GitHub stars, 5,223 forks, 1,514 open issues and last shipped today. jev-chat-jarvis has 8,382 stars, 1,338 forks, 29 open issues and last shipped 10 days ago. Cherry Studio leads on adoption by 539% (53,524 vs 8,382 stars). Cherry Studio is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0; jev-chat-jarvis is written in Kotlin under MIT. Cherry Studio has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, jev-chat-jarvis 16%. Cherry Studio was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (llm), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Cherry Studio ★ 54K jev-chat-jarvis ★ 8.4K category AI & Machine Learning

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

Cherry Studio jev-chat-jarvis
GitHub stars ★ 54K ★ 8.4K
License AGPL-3.0 MIT
Written in TypeScript Kotlin
Last push 2026-11-15 2026-11-05
Forks ⑂ 5.2K ⑂ 1.3K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Cherry Studio if

  • You weight community size — 54K stars and counting
  • You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Cherry Studio profile →

pick jev-chat-jarvis if

  • You want the jev-chat-jarvis feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Kotlin
  • You evaluated both and jev-chat-jarvis fits your workflow better

full jev-chat-jarvis profile →

About Cherry Studio

English Official Site Documents Development Feedback [![][deepwiki shield]][deepwiki link] [![][twitter shield]][twitter link] [![][discord shield]][discord link] [![][telegram shield]][telegram link] [![][github release shield]][github release link] [![][github nightly shield]][github nightly link] [![][github contributors shield]][github contributors link] [![][license shield]][license link] [![][commercial shield]][commercial link] [![][sponsor shield]][sponsor link] 🍒 Cherry Studio Cherry Studio is a desktop client that supports multiple LLM providers, available on Windows, Mac and Linux. 👏 Join Telegram…

read the full Cherry Studio overview →

About jev-chat-jarvis

Jev 聊天助手 Jev 对话副驾:在支持的平台分析聊天并给出回复建议;各端功能见对应项目说明,发送由你决定。 官网 · 安装与设置指南 · 候选回复使用建议 · 隐私政策 · 更新日志 开始使用 Jev 如果项目对你有帮助,欢迎点击本仓库右上角的 Star ,支持后续维护。获取和使用无需先加星或关注。 安装教程 · 交流更新: Android 安装说明 · Windows 项目说明 · macOS 项目说明 · 交流群与公众号。 ❤️赞助商 想出现在这里? 点击折叠 感谢 博查 赞助了本项目!博查是一个给 AI 用的搜索引擎,让你的 AI 应用连接世界知识,获得干净、准确、高质量的搜索结果。提供 Web Search API、Bocha Jev API 等多种联网搜索和模型服务。 open.bocha.cn 感谢 小优店铺 赞助了本项目!小优店铺是一家数字商品与账号服务店铺,为本项目的用户提供选购渠道。 点此前往 。 感谢 速创猫 Vytal 赞助了本项目!速创猫 Vytal 是专业的 AI 视频工作流平台,提供可批量复用的视频工作流,降低内容制作门槛,服务内容创作者、培训机构及中小团队。 点此前往 。 截图 悬浮窗:危险等级、对方真实意图、排好序的 3 条候选回复 设置页:判断 / 回复 / 视觉三路接口分别可配 为什么用它 它先判断,再写字。 大多数工具直接让模型编一句回复。Jev…

read the full jev-chat-jarvis overview →

More in AI & Machine Learning

Related comparisons

More AI Interaction & Interfaces projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Interaction & Interfaces field.

Frequently asked questions

Is Cherry Studio or jev-chat-jarvis more popular?

Cherry Studio has 53,524 GitHub stars and jev-chat-jarvis has 8,382. Cherry Studio has the larger community by that measure.

Are Cherry Studio and jev-chat-jarvis free?

Both are open source. Cherry Studio is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and jev-chat-jarvis under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Cherry Studio and jev-chat-jarvis?

Cherry Studio is written in TypeScript and jev-chat-jarvis in Kotlin. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Cherry Studio or jev-chat-jarvis?

Choose Cherry Studio if you want the larger community (53,524 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose jev-chat-jarvis if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.