head to head · open source
Cherry Studio vs Gemini-API
Cherry Studio has 53,202 GitHub stars, 5,164 forks, 1,514 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Gemini-API has 3,781 stars, 593 forks, 37 open issues and last shipped 26 days ago. Cherry Studio leads on adoption by 1,307% (53,202 vs 3,781 stars). Cherry Studio is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0; Gemini-API is written in Python under AGPL-3.0. Cherry Studio has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, Gemini-API 16%. Cherry Studio was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (llm), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Cherry Studio | Gemini-API | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 53K | ★ 3.8K |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Written in | TypeScript | Python |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-10-08 |
| Forks | ⑂ 5.2K | ⑂ 593 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Cherry Studio if
- You weight community size — 53K stars and counting
- You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick Gemini-API if
- You want the Gemini-API feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You evaluated both and Gemini-API fits your workflow better
About Cherry Studio
English Official Site Documents Development Feedback [![][deepwiki shield]][deepwiki link] [![][twitter shield]][twitter link] [![][discord shield]][discord link] [![][telegram shield]][telegram link] [![][github release shield]][github release link] [![][github nightly shield]][github nightly link] [![][github contributors shield]][github contributors link] [![][license shield]][license link] [![][commercial shield]][commercial link] [![][sponsor shield]][sponsor link] 🍒 Cherry Studio Cherry Studio is a desktop client that supports multiple LLM providers, available on Windows, Mac and Linux. 👏 Join Telegram…
read the full Cherry Studio overview →
About Gemini-API
Gemini API A reverse engineered asynchronous Python wrapper for the Google Gemini web app (formerly Bard). Features Persistent Cookies Automatically refreshes cookies in background. Optimized for always on services. Image Generation Natively supports generating and editing images with natural language. Video & Audio Generation Supports generating videos and audio/music content natively. Deep Research Full deep research workflow with plan creation, status polling, and result retrieval. System Prompt Supports customizing the model's system prompt with Gemini Gems. Extension Support Supports generating content with…
read the full Gemini-API overview →
More in AI & Machine Learning
Related comparisons
More AI Interaction & Interfaces projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Interaction & Interfaces field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Cherry Studio or Gemini-API more popular?
Cherry Studio has 53,202 GitHub stars and Gemini-API has 3,781. Cherry Studio has the larger community by that measure.
Are Cherry Studio and Gemini-API free?
Both are open source. Cherry Studio is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Gemini-API under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Cherry Studio and Gemini-API?
Cherry Studio is written in TypeScript and Gemini-API in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Cherry Studio or Gemini-API?
Choose Cherry Studio if you want the larger community (53,202 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose Gemini-API if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.