head to head · open source
Cherry Studio vs dsh-im
Cherry Studio has 52,848 GitHub stars, 5,105 forks, 1,514 open issues and last shipped yesterday. dsh-im has 2,292 stars, 237 forks, 64 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. Cherry Studio leads on adoption by 2,206% (52,848 vs 2,292 stars). Cherry Studio is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0; dsh-im is written in JavaScript under MIT. Cherry Studio has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, dsh-im 10%. Cherry Studio was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (deepseek), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Cherry Studio | dsh-im | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 53K | ★ 2.3K |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Written in | TypeScript | JavaScript |
| Last push | 2026-10-22 | 2026-10-21 |
| Forks | ⑂ 5.1K | ⑂ 237 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Cherry Studio if
- You weight community size — 53K stars and counting
- You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick dsh-im if
- You want the dsh-im feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You evaluated both and dsh-im fits your workflow better
About Cherry Studio
English Official Site Documents Development Feedback [![][deepwiki shield]][deepwiki link] [![][twitter shield]][twitter link] [![][discord shield]][discord link] [![][telegram shield]][telegram link] [![][github release shield]][github release link] [![][github nightly shield]][github nightly link] [![][github contributors shield]][github contributors link] [![][license shield]][license link] [![][commercial shield]][commercial link] [![][sponsor shield]][sponsor link] 🍒 Cherry Studio Cherry Studio is a desktop client that supports multiple LLM providers, available on Windows, Mac and Linux. 👏 Join Telegram…
read the full Cherry Studio overview →
About dsh-im
让 DeepSeek Harness 触手可及 Connecting DeepSeek Harness 简体中文 · English [!NOTE] DSH IM 已获得 DeepSeek Harness 官方 Token 赞助，价值人民币 2,000 元 。感谢官方对本项目的支持！ 本项目由社区开发者独立开发与维护。 [!IMPORTANT] 安装请认准完整包名： @xmanrui/dsh im 为避免名称混淆，在插件市场搜索、插件安装框中填写或使用命令安装时，请复制下方完整包名。 选择对应的一条命令： Desktop 在内置终端执行， Web 在启动当前 Harness 的终端执行。 安装后重启 Desktop 或 dsh web ，Web 刷新浏览器，再打开「设置 → IM机器人」。 简介 通过扫码、App Manifest 或已有机器人凭据把 IM 机器人接入 DeepSeek Harness，并让本机 Harness 主动连接公网 AI Office。一个插件、一个设置入口，统一管理内置 IM 渠道和 AI Office Connector。 每个 IM 渠道都支持接入多个机器人 ，各机器人的连接状态、工作区、模型和会话绑定彼此独立；iMessage 是本机 Messages.app 身份接入的例外，详见iMessage 渠道说明。 Connect IM bots to DeepSeek Harness by…
read the full dsh-im overview →
More in AI & Machine Learning
Related comparisons
More AI Interaction & Interfaces projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Interaction & Interfaces field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Cherry Studio or dsh-im more popular?
Cherry Studio has 52,848 GitHub stars and dsh-im has 2,292. Cherry Studio has the larger community by that measure.
Are Cherry Studio and dsh-im free?
Both are open source. Cherry Studio is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and dsh-im under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Cherry Studio and dsh-im?
Cherry Studio is written in TypeScript and dsh-im in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Cherry Studio or dsh-im?
Choose Cherry Studio if you want the larger community (52,848 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose dsh-im if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.