head to head · open source
Cherry Studio vs Dive
Cherry Studio has 53,242 GitHub stars, 5,172 forks, 1,514 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Dive has 1,823 stars, 172 forks, 34 open issues and last shipped 3 months ago. Cherry Studio leads on adoption by 2,821% (53,242 vs 1,823 stars). Cherry Studio is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0; Dive is written in TypeScript under MIT. Cherry Studio has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, Dive 9%. Cherry Studio was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 3 topic tags (ai-agents, mcp-client, ollama), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Cherry Studio | Dive | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 53K | ★ 1.8K |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Written in | TypeScript | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-11-04 | 2026-07-31 |
| Forks | ⑂ 5.2K | ⑂ 172 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Cherry Studio if
- You weight community size — 53K stars and counting
- You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick Dive if
- You want the Dive feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and Dive fits your workflow better
About Cherry Studio
English Official Site Documents Development Feedback [![][deepwiki shield]][deepwiki link] [![][twitter shield]][twitter link] [![][discord shield]][discord link] [![][telegram shield]][telegram link] [![][github release shield]][github release link] [![][github nightly shield]][github nightly link] [![][github contributors shield]][github contributors link] [![][license shield]][license link] [![][commercial shield]][commercial link] [![][sponsor shield]][sponsor link] 🍒 Cherry Studio Cherry Studio is a desktop client that supports multiple LLM providers, available on Windows, Mac and Linux. 👏 Join Telegram…
read the full Cherry Studio overview →
About Dive
Dive AI Agent Dive is an open source MCP Host Desktop Application that seamlessly integrates with any LLMs supporting function calling capabilities. ✨ Features 🎯 🌐 Universal LLM Support : Compatible with ChatGPT, Anthropic, Ollama and OpenAI compatible models 💻 Cross Platform : Available for Windows, MacOS, and Linux 🔄 Model Context Protocol : Enabling seamless MCP AI agent integration on both stdio and SSE mode ☁️ OAP Cloud Integration : One click access to managed MCP servers via OAPHub.ai eliminates complex local deployments 🏗️ Dual Architecture : Modern Tauri version alongside traditional Electron…
More in AI & Machine Learning
Related comparisons
More AI Interaction & Interfaces projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Interaction & Interfaces field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Cherry Studio or Dive more popular?
Cherry Studio has 53,242 GitHub stars and Dive has 1,823. Cherry Studio has the larger community by that measure.
Are Cherry Studio and Dive free?
Both are open source. Cherry Studio is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Dive under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Cherry Studio and Dive?
Cherry Studio is written in TypeScript and Dive in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Cherry Studio or Dive?
Choose Cherry Studio if you want the larger community (53,242 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose Dive if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.