head to head · open source
Cherry Studio vs CosyVoice
Cherry Studio has 51,923 GitHub stars, 4,976 forks, 1,514 open issues and last shipped yesterday. CosyVoice has 23,661 stars, 2,690 forks, 698 open issues and last shipped 4 months ago. Cherry Studio leads on adoption by 119% (51,923 vs 23,661 stars). Cherry Studio is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0; CosyVoice is written in Python under Apache-2.0. Cherry Studio has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, CosyVoice 11%. Cherry Studio was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 8884 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Cherry Studio | CosyVoice | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 52K | ★ 24K |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Written in | TypeScript | Python |
| Last push | 2026-09-17 | 2026-05-25 |
| Forks | ⑂ 5.0K | ⑂ 2.7K |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Cherry Studio if
- You weight community size — 52K stars and counting
- You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick CosyVoice if
- You want the CosyVoice feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You evaluated both and CosyVoice fits your workflow better
About Cherry Studio
Cherry Studio is a cross platform desktop application for interacting with large language models, built in TypeScript under the AGPL 3.0 license. It operates in the AI interaction and interfaces ecosystem, providing a unified interface to access cloud hosted models (OpenAI, Gemini, Anthropic), web services (Claude, Poe, Perplexity), and locally hosted models via Ollama or LM Studio.
read the full Cherry Studio overview →
About CosyVoice
CosyVoice is an Apache 2.0 Python text to speech system built on large language models that ships inference, training and deployment for multi lingual voice generation, aimed at teams who need self hosted zero shot voice cloning and streaming speech synthesis rather than a hosted API.
read the full CosyVoice overview →
More in AI & Machine Learning
Related comparisons
More AI Interaction & Interfaces projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Interaction & Interfaces field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Cherry Studio or CosyVoice more popular?
Cherry Studio has 51,923 GitHub stars and CosyVoice has 23,661. Cherry Studio has the larger community by that measure.
Are Cherry Studio and CosyVoice free?
Both are open source. Cherry Studio is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and CosyVoice under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Cherry Studio and CosyVoice?
Cherry Studio is written in TypeScript and CosyVoice in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Cherry Studio or CosyVoice?
Choose Cherry Studio if you want the larger community (51,923 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose CosyVoice if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.