head to head · open source
Cherry Studio vs codex-mobile
Cherry Studio has 53,242 GitHub stars, 5,172 forks, 1,514 open issues and last shipped yesterday. codex-mobile has 978 stars, 205 forks, 44 open issues and last shipped 2 months ago. Cherry Studio leads on adoption by 5,344% (53,242 vs 978 stars). Cherry Studio is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0; codex-mobile is written in TypeScript under MIT. Cherry Studio has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, codex-mobile 21%. Cherry Studio was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (ai-agents), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Cherry Studio | codex-mobile | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 53K | ★ 978 |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Written in | TypeScript | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-11-04 | 2026-09-20 |
| Forks | ⑂ 5.2K | ⑂ 205 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Cherry Studio if
- You weight community size — 53K stars and counting
- You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick codex-mobile if
- You want the codex-mobile feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and codex-mobile fits your workflow better
About Cherry Studio
English Official Site Documents Development Feedback [![][deepwiki shield]][deepwiki link] [![][twitter shield]][twitter link] [![][discord shield]][discord link] [![][telegram shield]][telegram link] [![][github release shield]][github release link] [![][github nightly shield]][github nightly link] [![][github contributors shield]][github contributors link] [![][license shield]][license link] [![][commercial shield]][commercial link] [![][sponsor shield]][sponsor link] 🍒 Cherry Studio Cherry Studio is a desktop client that supports multiple LLM providers, available on Windows, Mac and Linux. 👏 Join Telegram…
read the full Cherry Studio overview →
About codex-mobile
🔥 codexapp 🚀 Run Codex App UI Anywhere: Linux, Windows, or Termux on Android 🚀 Codex UI in your browser. No drama. One command. Yes, that is your Codex desktop app experience exposed over web UI. Yes, it runs cross platform. 🤯 What Is This? codexapp is a lightweight bridge that gives you a browser accessible UI for Codex app server workflows. You run one command. It starts a local web server. You open it from your machine, your LAN, or wherever your setup allows. TL;DR 🧠: Codex app UI, unlocked for Linux, Windows, and Termux powered Android setups. ⚡ Quick Start The main event. By default, codexapp now also…
read the full codex-mobile overview →
More in AI & Machine Learning
Related comparisons
More AI Interaction & Interfaces projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Interaction & Interfaces field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Cherry Studio or codex-mobile more popular?
Cherry Studio has 53,242 GitHub stars and codex-mobile has 978. Cherry Studio has the larger community by that measure.
Are Cherry Studio and codex-mobile free?
Both are open source. Cherry Studio is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and codex-mobile under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Cherry Studio and codex-mobile?
Cherry Studio is written in TypeScript and codex-mobile in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Cherry Studio or codex-mobile?
Choose Cherry Studio if you want the larger community (53,242 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose codex-mobile if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.