head to head · open source

Cherry Studio vs claude-chat-exporter

Cherry Studio has 53,265 GitHub stars, 5,178 forks, 1,514 open issues and last shipped today. claude-chat-exporter has 743 stars, 85 forks, 1 open issues and last shipped 13 days ago. Cherry Studio leads on adoption by 7,069% (53,265 vs 743 stars). Cherry Studio is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0; claude-chat-exporter is written in JavaScript under MIT. Cherry Studio has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, claude-chat-exporter 11%. Cherry Studio was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Cherry Studio ★ 53K claude-chat-exporter ★ 743 category AI & Machine Learning

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

Cherry Studio claude-chat-exporter
GitHub stars ★ 53K ★ 743
License AGPL-3.0 MIT
Written in TypeScript JavaScript
Last push 2026-11-05 2026-10-23
Forks ⑂ 5.2K ⑂ 85
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Cherry Studio if

  • You weight community size — 53K stars and counting
  • You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Cherry Studio profile →

pick claude-chat-exporter if

  • You want the claude-chat-exporter feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You evaluated both and claude-chat-exporter fits your workflow better

full claude-chat-exporter profile →

About Cherry Studio

English Official Site Documents Development Feedback [![][deepwiki shield]][deepwiki link] [![][twitter shield]][twitter link] [![][discord shield]][discord link] [![][telegram shield]][telegram link] [![][github release shield]][github release link] [![][github nightly shield]][github nightly link] [![][github contributors shield]][github contributors link] [![][license shield]][license link] [![][commercial shield]][commercial link] [![][sponsor shield]][sponsor link] 🍒 Cherry Studio Cherry Studio is a desktop client that supports multiple LLM providers, available on Windows, Mac and Linux. 👏 Join Telegram…

read the full Cherry Studio overview →

About claude-chat-exporter

Claude Chat Exporter A privacy first tool that exports your Claude.ai conversations to clean Markdown. It runs entirely in your browser — no server of its own, nothing uploaded, no tracking. Everything comes through — tables, math and code at full fidelity, plus artifacts, created files, charts and attachments — all read directly from Claude's own API. Exports carry YAML frontmatter with one heading per turn, so they drop straight into an Obsidian vault or a RAG pipeline. Claude's internal API changes without notice, and someone has to keep up. Sponsoring this project is what keeps it maintained. More → ⚡ One…

read the full claude-chat-exporter overview →

More in AI & Machine Learning

Related comparisons

More AI Interaction & Interfaces projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Interaction & Interfaces field.

Frequently asked questions

Is Cherry Studio or claude-chat-exporter more popular?

Cherry Studio has 53,265 GitHub stars and claude-chat-exporter has 743. Cherry Studio has the larger community by that measure.

Are Cherry Studio and claude-chat-exporter free?

Both are open source. Cherry Studio is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and claude-chat-exporter under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Cherry Studio and claude-chat-exporter?

Cherry Studio is written in TypeScript and claude-chat-exporter in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Cherry Studio or claude-chat-exporter?

Choose Cherry Studio if you want the larger community (53,265 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose claude-chat-exporter if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.