head to head · open source
Cherry Studio vs claude-agents-library
Cherry Studio has 53,242 GitHub stars, 5,172 forks, 1,514 open issues and last shipped yesterday. claude-agents-library has 758 stars, 121 forks, 1 open issues and last shipped 7 months ago. Cherry Studio leads on adoption by 6,924% (53,242 vs 758 stars). Cherry Studio is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0; claude-agents-library is written in various languages under MIT. Cherry Studio has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, claude-agents-library 16%. Cherry Studio was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (ai-agents), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Cherry Studio | claude-agents-library | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 53K | ★ 758 |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Written in | TypeScript | — |
| Last push | 2026-11-04 | 2026-04-14 |
| Forks | ⑂ 5.2K | ⑂ 121 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Cherry Studio if
- You weight community size — 53K stars and counting
- You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick claude-agents-library if
- You want the claude-agents-library feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- You evaluated both and claude-agents-library fits your workflow better
About Cherry Studio
English Official Site Documents Development Feedback [![][deepwiki shield]][deepwiki link] [![][twitter shield]][twitter link] [![][discord shield]][discord link] [![][telegram shield]][telegram link] [![][github release shield]][github release link] [![][github nightly shield]][github nightly link] [![][github contributors shield]][github contributors link] [![][license shield]][license link] [![][commercial shield]][commercial link] [![][sponsor shield]][sponsor link] 🍒 Cherry Studio Cherry Studio is a desktop client that supports multiple LLM providers, available on Windows, Mac and Linux. 👏 Join Telegram…
read the full Cherry Studio overview →
About claude-agents-library
🤖 Claude Agents Library 34 Production Ready AI Agents for Claude — Copy, paste, and customize for any professional role Quick Start • Find an Agent • Categories • MCP Integration • Cost Optimization • www.aiagentskit.com 📖 Table of Contents What's New What is This? Why Use Agents? Quick Agent Finder Categories The Agents Quick Start MCP Integration Cost Optimization Customization Contributing Resources 🆕 What's New in v1.2 (January 16, 2026) [!NOTE] Latest update brings powerful new features for cost optimization and productivity! ✅ 7 MCP Integration Patterns — Copy paste workflows with code examples ✅ Model…
read the full claude-agents-library overview →
More in AI & Machine Learning
Related comparisons
More AI Interaction & Interfaces projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Interaction & Interfaces field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Cherry Studio or claude-agents-library more popular?
Cherry Studio has 53,242 GitHub stars and claude-agents-library has 758. Cherry Studio has the larger community by that measure.
Are Cherry Studio and claude-agents-library free?
Both are open source. Cherry Studio is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and claude-agents-library under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Cherry Studio and claude-agents-library?
Cherry Studio is written in TypeScript and claude-agents-library in various languages. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Cherry Studio or claude-agents-library?
Choose Cherry Studio if you want the larger community (53,242 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose claude-agents-library if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.