head to head · open source

casdoor vs os

casdoor has 14,518 GitHub stars, 1,831 forks, 97 open issues and last shipped yesterday. os has 803 stars, 26 forks, 46 open issues and last shipped yesterday. casdoor leads on adoption by 1,708% (14,518 vs 803 stars). casdoor is written in Go under Apache-2.0; os is written in TypeScript under MIT. casdoor has attracted 13% as many forks as stars, os 3%. os was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (agentic-ai, llm), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

casdoor ★ 15K os ★ 803 category Security & Privacy

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

casdoor os
GitHub stars ★ 15K ★ 803
License Apache-2.0 MIT
Written in Go TypeScript
Last push 2026-10-06 2026-10-06
Forks ⑂ 1.8K ⑂ 26
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick casdoor if

  • You weight community size — 15K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full casdoor profile →

pick os if

  • You want the os feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and os fits your workflow better

full os profile →

About casdoor

Casdoor is an open source, self hosted identity and access management platform written in Go and licensed under Apache 2.0, which provides a single sign on and authentication server with a web console for teams that want to own their user directory rather than delegate it to a hosted provider.

read the full casdoor overview →

About os

ibl.ai/os is an MIT licensed, self hostable open source platform for building, deploying, and managing customizable AI agents across web, desktop, mobile, and browser, aimed at organizations that want to own their code and data.

read the full os overview →

More in Security & Privacy

PayloadsAllTheThings ★ 82K Puter ★ 44K Mattermost ★ 39K Tailscale ★ 37K Keycloak ★ 37K HashiCorp Vault ★ 36K

Related comparisons

supabase vs better-auth keycloak vs jumpserver keycloak vs better-auth keycloak vs authelia keycloak vs authentik jumpserver vs better-auth jumpserver vs authelia better-auth vs authelia payloadsallthethings vs vault vaultwarden vs vault payloadsallthethings vs unkey payloadsallthethings vs phase payloadsallthethings vs keyshade puter vs vault mattermost vs vault keycloak vs vault payloadsallthethings vs anthropic-cybersecurity-skills payloadsallthethings vs projectdiscovery payloadsallthethings vs pentagi payloadsallthethings vs pentestgpt payloadsallthethings vs osintgram payloadsallthethings vs vuls payloadsallthethings vs osv-scanner payloadsallthethings vs nettacker

More Identity & Access Management (IAM) projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Identity & Access Management (IAM) field.

casdoor vs Keycloak casdoor vs JumpServer casdoor vs Better Auth casdoor vs authelia casdoor vs Authentik casdoor vs casbin casdoor vs Sa-Token casdoor vs hydra casdoor vs SuperTokens casdoor vs Zitadel casdoor vs oauth2-proxy casdoor vs Logto

Frequently asked questions

Is casdoor or os more popular?

casdoor has 14,518 GitHub stars and os has 803. casdoor has the larger community by that measure.

Are casdoor and os free?

Both are open source. casdoor is licensed under Apache-2.0 and os under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between casdoor and os?

casdoor is written in Go and os in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, casdoor or os?

Choose casdoor if you want the larger community (14,518 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose os if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.