head to head · open source
Automa vs local-deep-research
Automa has 21,705 GitHub stars, 2,344 forks, 377 open issues and last shipped 8 months ago. local-deep-research has 9,483 stars, 899 forks, 889 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Automa leads on adoption by 129% (21,705 vs 9,483 stars). Automa is written in Vue under a custom or non-standard licence; local-deep-research is written in Python under MIT. Automa has attracted 11% as many forks as stars, local-deep-research 9%. local-deep-research was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Automa | local-deep-research | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 22K | ★ 9.5K |
| License | Custom / other | MIT |
| Written in | Vue | Python |
| Last push | 2026-03-02 | 2026-11-02 |
| Forks | ⑂ 2.3K | ⑂ 899 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Automa if
- You weight community size — 22K stars and counting
- You want the Custom / other license terms
- Your stack matches Vue
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick local-deep-research if
- You want the local-deep-research feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You evaluated both and local-deep-research fits your workflow better
About Automa
Automa An extension for automating your browser by connecting blocks. Auto fill forms, do a repetitive task, take a screenshot, or scrape website data — the choice is yours. You can even schedule when the automation will execute! Downloads Chrome Web Store Firefox Add ons Marketplace Browse the Automa marketplace where you can share and download workflows with others. Go to the marketplace & 187; Automa Chrome Extension Builder Automa Chrome Extension Builder (Automa CEB for short) allows you to generate a standalone chrome extension based on Automa workflows. Go to the documentation & 187; Project setup Before…
read the full Automa overview →
About local-deep-research
Local Deep Research AI powered research assistant for deep, agentic research Performs deep, agentic research using multiple LLMs and search engines with proper citations 🧪 First open source project — fully local on a single RTX 3090 (Qwen3.6 27B) — to report 95% SimpleQA (n=500) and 77% xbench DeepSearch (n=100) on local hardware. See the r/LocalLLaMA announcement and the benchmark dataset. ▶️ Watch Review by The Art Of The Terminal 🚀 What is Local Deep Research? AI research assistant you control. Run locally for privacy, use any LLM and build your own searchable knowledge base. You own your data and see…
read the full local-deep-research overview →
More in Data & Analytics
Related comparisons
More Data Extraction & Web Scraping projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Extraction & Web Scraping field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Automa or local-deep-research more popular?
Automa has 21,705 GitHub stars and local-deep-research has 9,483. Automa has the larger community by that measure.
Are Automa and local-deep-research free?
Both are open source. Automa has no licence declared in this registry, and local-deep-research is licensed under MIT. Both are free to self-host.
What is the difference between Automa and local-deep-research?
Automa is written in Vue and local-deep-research in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Automa or local-deep-research?
Choose Automa if you want the larger community (21,705 stars) or its Custom / other licence terms. Choose local-deep-research if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.