head to head · open source

AstrBot vs node-telegram-bot-api

AstrBot has 45,992 GitHub stars, 3,378 forks, 1,516 open issues and last shipped yesterday. node-telegram-bot-api has 9,217 stars, 1,647 forks, 1 open issues and last shipped yesterday. AstrBot leads on adoption by 399% (45,992 vs 9,217 stars). AstrBot is written in Python under AGPL-3.0; node-telegram-bot-api is written in TypeScript under MIT. AstrBot has attracted 7% as many forks as stars, node-telegram-bot-api 18%. AstrBot was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (chatbot), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

AstrBot ★ 46K node-telegram-bot-api ★ 9.2K category AI & Machine Learning

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

AstrBot node-telegram-bot-api
GitHub stars ★ 46K ★ 9.2K
License AGPL-3.0 MIT
Written in Python TypeScript
Last push 2026-11-04 2026-11-04
Forks ⑂ 3.4K ⑂ 1.6K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick AstrBot if

  • You weight community size — 46K stars and counting
  • You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full AstrBot profile →

pick node-telegram-bot-api if

  • You want the node-telegram-bot-api feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and node-telegram-bot-api fits your workflow better

full node-telegram-bot-api profile →

About AstrBot

简体中文 | 繁體中文 | 日本語 | Français | Español | Русский Documentation | Blog | Roadmap | Issue Tracker | Email Support AstrBot is an open source all in one Agent chatbot platform that integrates with mainstream instant messaging apps. It provides reliable and scalable conversational AI infrastructure for individuals, developers, and teams. Whether you're building a personal AI companion, intelligent customer service, automation assistant, or enterprise knowledge base, AstrBot enables you to quickly build production ready AI applications within your IM platform workflows. Key Features 1. 💯 Free & Open Source. 2. ✨ AI…

read the full AstrBot overview →

About node-telegram-bot-api

✨ A Modern Telegram Bot API Library ✨ v2 is a from scratch redesign, no v1 compatibility. Coming from v1? See the v1 v2 migration guide in the changelog. 📦 Install Runs on Bun, modern Node.js, Deno, Cloudflare Workers and Vercel Functions λ 🚀 Usage 📡 Calling the API directly Api mirrors the wire API 1:1 one method per Bot API method, each taking a single params object. 🧩 Middleware koa style middleware around every update; on / command / hears are filters in the same chain. Wrap downstream work with await next() . ⌨️ Keyboards & formatting Structured fields are plain typed objects pass a literal or use a…

read the full node-telegram-bot-api overview →

More in AI & Machine Learning

Related comparisons

More AI Interaction & Interfaces projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Interaction & Interfaces field.

Frequently asked questions

Is AstrBot or node-telegram-bot-api more popular?

AstrBot has 45,992 GitHub stars and node-telegram-bot-api has 9,217. AstrBot has the larger community by that measure.

Are AstrBot and node-telegram-bot-api free?

Both are open source. AstrBot is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and node-telegram-bot-api under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between AstrBot and node-telegram-bot-api?

AstrBot is written in Python and node-telegram-bot-api in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, AstrBot or node-telegram-bot-api?

Choose AstrBot if you want the larger community (45,992 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose node-telegram-bot-api if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.