head to head · open source

Agenta vs OpenLIT

Agenta has 4,891 GitHub stars, 725 forks, 309 open issues and last shipped yesterday. OpenLIT has 2,902 stars, 456 forks, 60 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. Agenta leads on adoption by 69% (4,891 vs 2,902 stars). Agenta is written in TypeScript under a custom or non-standard licence; OpenLIT is written in TypeScript under Apache-2.0. Agenta has attracted 15% as many forks as stars, OpenLIT 16%. Agenta was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Agenta ★ 4.9K OpenLIT ★ 2.9K category AI & Machine Learning

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

Agenta OpenLIT
GitHub stars ★ 4.9K ★ 2.9K
License Custom / other Apache-2.0
Written in TypeScript TypeScript
Last push 2026-11-04 2026-11-03
Forks ⑂ 725 ⑂ 456
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Agenta if

  • You weight community size — 4.9K stars and counting
  • You want the Custom / other license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Agenta profile →

pick OpenLIT if

  • You want the OpenLIT feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and OpenLIT fits your workflow better

full OpenLIT profile →

About Agenta

The open source workspace for building and running agents Build agents that automate your work by chatting with them. Share them with your team , connect them to the apps you use, and run them in the background . Documentation • Website • Agenta Cloud What is Agenta? Agenta is an open source workspace where you build specialized agents that automate and augment your work. You build agents by chatting with them. You describe the work, connect the apps they need, and improve them through feedback. You can work with your agents directly in chat and share them with your team. For recurring work, you can…

read the full Agenta overview →

About OpenLIT

Open source observability & evaluation for AI agents Trace, evaluate, debug, and optimize AI applications and coding agents with OpenTelemetry. ⭐ Star 🚀 Quickstart 📚 Docs Documentation · Quickstart · Examples · Join Slack See what your AI agents are actually doing AI applications are no longer just LLM calls. A production agent can involve: OpenLIT gives you visibility across the entire workflow. Trace every LLM call, tool invocation, prompt, agent step, token, cost, error, and evaluation — using OpenTelemetry. ⚡ Get started in 5 minutes 1. Start OpenLIT Open: 2. Install the SDK Python: TypeScript: 3…

read the full OpenLIT overview →

More in AI & Machine Learning

Related comparisons

More Machine Learning Infrastructure projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Machine Learning Infrastructure field.

Frequently asked questions

Is Agenta or OpenLIT more popular?

Agenta has 4,891 GitHub stars and OpenLIT has 2,902. Agenta has the larger community by that measure.

Are Agenta and OpenLIT free?

Both are open source. Agenta has no licence declared in this registry, and OpenLIT is licensed under Apache-2.0. Both are free to self-host.

What is the difference between Agenta and OpenLIT ?

Agenta is written in TypeScript and OpenLIT in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Agenta or OpenLIT ?

Choose Agenta if you want the larger community (4,891 stars) or its Custom / other licence terms. Choose OpenLIT if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.