head to head · open source

Agent-Reach vs invisible_playwright_mcp

Agent-Reach has 109,741 GitHub stars, 9,814 forks, 137 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. invisible_playwright_mcp has 872 stars, 117 forks, 4 open issues and last shipped 18 days ago. Agent-Reach leads on adoption by 12,485% (109,741 vs 872 stars). Agent-Reach is written in Python under MIT; invisible_playwright_mcp is written in Python under MIT. Agent-Reach has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, invisible_playwright_mcp 13%. Agent-Reach was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Agent-Reach ★ 110K invisible_playwright_mcp ★ 872 category AI & Machine Learning

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

Agent-Reach invisible_playwright_mcp
GitHub stars ★ 110K ★ 872
License MIT MIT
Written in Python Python
Last push 2026-11-06 2026-10-21
Forks ⑂ 9.8K ⑂ 117
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Agent-Reach if

  • You weight community size — 110K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Agent-Reach profile →

pick invisible_playwright_mcp if

  • You want the invisible_playwright_mcp feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You evaluated both and invisible_playwright_mcp fits your workflow better

full invisible_playwright_mcp profile →

About Agent-Reach

👁️ Agent Reach 给你的 AI Agent 一键装上互联网能力 当下最稳的接入方式,替你选好、装好、体检好——接入方式会换代,你不用操心 快速开始 · English · 日本語 · 한국어 · 支持平台 · 设计理念 ❤️赞助商 想出现在这里? 点击折叠 BrowserAct 支持从 Amazon、LinkedIn、X、Google Maps 等复杂网站提取你需要的任意数据。你只需用自然语言描述抓取需求,Agent 就会基于真实浏览器自动探索并测试页面流程,生成可靠、可复用的数据采集 Bot,并返回结构化结果。无需手动构建爬虫,无需编写代码。BrowserAct 内置隐身浏览、验证码处理和高质量住宅代理,帮助你更稳定地完成复杂网页数据采集。新用户注册即送 1000 积分, 立即免费试用 。 在腾讯云 Lighthouse 秒级部署 OpenClaw 全能助手,可通过对话丝滑接入 Agent Reach,给你的 OpenClaw 一键装上互联网能力。 CoreClaw 网页抓取平台与现成数据采集工具,CoreClaw 提供 100+ 现成数据采集工具,支持 Amazon、TikTok、Google Maps、Instagram、Facebook、YouTube 等平台,无需代码,支持 JSON/CSV 导出,仅对成功结果计费。 免费$3测试! 优刻得星图astraflow大模型…

read the full Agent-Reach overview →

About invisible_playwright_mcp

An anti detect browser and web browsing agent, open source, with an MCP server for coding agents: undetected, no captchas, no blocks. Tell it what you want in plain language. Two ways to use this browser agent 1. From your assistant, over MCP Windows, in PowerShell: Linux: Then install it in your assistant. Claude Code: Codex: Gemini CLI: 2. Standalone: the web UI We bring the interface, you bring an OpenRouter key. Chat on the left, the live browser on the right. Windows, in PowerShell: Linux: Then open and type the same thing. What to ask a web browsing agent Anything that needs real web automation: a browser…

read the full invisible_playwright_mcp overview →

More in AI & Machine Learning

Related comparisons

More AI Development Platforms projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Development Platforms field.

Frequently asked questions

Is Agent-Reach or invisible_playwright_mcp more popular?

Agent-Reach has 109,741 GitHub stars and invisible_playwright_mcp has 872. Agent-Reach has the larger community by that measure.

Are Agent-Reach and invisible_playwright_mcp free?

Both are open source. Agent-Reach is licensed under MIT and invisible_playwright_mcp under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Agent-Reach and invisible_playwright_mcp?

Agent-Reach is written in Python and invisible_playwright_mcp in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Agent-Reach or invisible_playwright_mcp?

Choose Agent-Reach if you want the larger community (109,741 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose invisible_playwright_mcp if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.