head to head · open source

suricata vs WireGuard

suricata has 6,646 GitHub stars, 1,769 forks, 86 open issues and last shipped yesterday. WireGuard has 717 stars, 311 forks, 20 open issues and last shipped 5 months ago. suricata leads on adoption by 827% (6,646 vs 717 stars). suricata is written in C under GPL-2.0; WireGuard is written in C under GPL-2.0. suricata has attracted 27% as many forks as stars, WireGuard 43%. suricata was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

suricata ★ 6.6K WireGuard ★ 717 category Security & Privacy

← all 15422 open source comparisons

Side by side

suricata WireGuard
GitHub stars ★ 6.6K ★ 717
License GPL-2.0 GPL-2.0
Written in C C
Last push 2026-09-18 2026-05-06
Forks ⑂ 1.8K ⑂ 311
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick suricata if

  • You weight community size — 6.6K stars and counting
  • You want the GPL-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches C
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full suricata profile →

pick WireGuard if

  • You want the WireGuard feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the GPL-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches C
  • You evaluated both and WireGuard fits your workflow better

full WireGuard profile →

About suricata

Suricata is a network Intrusion Detection System (IDS), Intrusion Prevention System (IPS) and Network Security Monitoring (NSM) engine developed by the OISF and the Suricata community, released under GPL 2.0 and written in C, for security teams that need to detect, block and record activity on the networks they operate.

read the full suricata overview →

About WireGuard

WireGuard's userspace tooling, packaged as wireguard tools, is the command line layer that configures WireGuard VPN tunnels, aimed at system administrators, distribution packagers and anyone who needs to bring a WireGuard interface up and down from a shell or an init system.

read the full WireGuard overview →

More in Security & Privacy

PayloadsAllTheThings ★ 81K Puter ★ 44K Mattermost ★ 39K Keycloak ★ 37K Tailscale ★ 37K HashiCorp Vault ★ 36K

Related comparisons

tailscale vs wireguard tailscale vs netbird tailscale vs pangolin netbird vs pangolin tailscale vs openvpn tailscale vs firezone tailscale vs defguard netbird vs firezone supabase vs better-auth keycloak vs jumpserver keycloak vs better-auth keycloak vs authentik jumpserver vs better-auth jumpserver vs authentik better-auth vs authentik jumpserver vs teleport puter vs mattermost mattermost vs nextcloud puter vs signal puter vs ente mattermost vs signal mattermost vs ente mattermost vs zulip signal vs ente

More Network Security projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Network Security field.

suricata vs Tailscale suricata vs Netbird suricata vs Pangolin suricata vs FireZone suricata vs Defguard suricata vs Werbot

Frequently asked questions

Is suricata or WireGuard more popular?

suricata has 6,646 GitHub stars and WireGuard has 717. suricata has the larger community by that measure.

Are suricata and WireGuard free?

Both are open source. suricata is licensed under GPL-2.0 and WireGuard under GPL-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between suricata and WireGuard?

suricata is written in C and WireGuard in C. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, suricata or WireGuard?

Choose suricata if you want the larger community (6,646 stars) or its GPL-2.0 licence terms. Choose WireGuard if its feature set, stack or GPL-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.