head to head · open source

FireZone vs Werbot

FireZone has 9,097 GitHub stars, 456 forks, 412 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Werbot has 170 stars, 10 forks, 18 open issues and last shipped 2 months ago. FireZone leads on adoption by 5,251% (9,097 vs 170 stars). FireZone is written in Elixir under Apache-2.0; Werbot is written in Go under a custom or non-standard licence. FireZone has attracted 5% as many forks as stars, Werbot 6%. FireZone was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

FireZone ★ 9.1K Werbot ★ 170 category Security & Privacy

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

FireZone Werbot
GitHub stars ★ 9.1K ★ 170
License Apache-2.0 Custom / other
Written in Elixir Go
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-08-03
Forks ⑂ 456 ⑂ 10
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick FireZone if

  • You weight community size — 9.1K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Elixir
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full FireZone profile →

pick Werbot if

  • You want the Werbot feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Custom / other license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and Werbot fits your workflow better

full Werbot profile →

About FireZone

FireZone is an enterprise ready zero trust access platform built on WireGuard. It connects users to private applications, databases, servers, and subnets through granular policies that define who can reach each Resource and under what conditions. It lives in the Security & Privacy / Network Security ecosystem, with Elixir, Phoenix LiveView, and Rust components indicated by repository topics and language metadata.

read the full FireZone overview →

About Werbot

Werbot is a self hosted server access management platform written in Go and packaged as Docker containers that run as microservices. It gives a team a single place from which to grant, control and audit access to servers, databases, web applications, desktops, containers and clouds, using single sign on rather than shared passwords or scattered private keys. The project lives in the Go and container ecosystem, with supporting components for a web dashboard, enterprise functions, an install script, Windows and Unix agents, and a Pluggable Authentication Module for native two factor authentication on nix platforms.…

read the full Werbot overview →

More in Security & Privacy

Puter ★ 44K Mattermost ★ 39K Keycloak ★ 37K Tailscale ★ 37K HashiCorp Vault ★ 36K JumpServer ★ 32K

Related comparisons

tailscale vs firezone netbird vs firezone tailscale vs werbot tailscale vs netbird tailscale vs pangolin netbird vs pangolin tailscale vs defguard tailscale vs wireguard puter vs mattermost puter vs signal puter vs ente mattermost vs signal mattermost vs ente signal vs ente puter vs element puter vs fluxer puter vs vault mattermost vs vault puter vs unkey mattermost vs unkey puter vs phase puter vs keyshade vault vs unkey mattermost vs phase

More Network Security projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Network Security field.

FireZone vs Tailscale FireZone vs Netbird FireZone vs Pangolin FireZone vs Defguard FireZone vs WireGuard

Frequently asked questions

Is FireZone or Werbot more popular?

FireZone has 9,097 GitHub stars and Werbot has 170. FireZone has the larger community by that measure.

Are FireZone and Werbot free?

Both are open source. FireZone is licensed under Apache-2.0, and Werbot has no licence declared in this registry. Both are free to self-host.

What is the difference between FireZone and Werbot?

FireZone is written in Elixir and Werbot in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, FireZone or Werbot?

Choose FireZone if you want the larger community (9,097 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose Werbot if its feature set, stack or Custom / other licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.